Literature DB >> 18266102

Predictive value of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in repeated IVF-ET cycles among women with recurrent implantation failure.

K Pagidas1, Y Ying, D Keefe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of euploid embryos in women with recurrent implantation failure undergoing repeated IVF-ET cycles with PGD (PGD).
DESIGN: Cohort of IVF-PGD cycles in a tertiary care ART facility. MATERIALS AND METHOD(S): Fifty-five consecutive patients with repeated implantation failure (more than three failed IVF-ET cycles) underwent two or more PGD cycles for aneuploidy testing. Mean maternal age was 37.6+/-5.3 years. Biopsies were performed on day 3. One blastomere was removed from each pre-embryo, fixed and analyzed by multicolor and multi-probe FISH for chromosomes X and Y, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 22. RESULT(S): Forty-three of 55 patients (78%) undergoing PGD had at least one euploid embryo for transfer. Of these 31 patients (72%) also had at least one euploid embryo available for transfer with the second cycle. Of the 12 (28%) patients with no euploid embryos available for transfer with the second IVF/PGD cycle, five had a third cycle of PGD and two of these had euploid embryos available for transfer. Seventeen of the 31 patients (55%) who had euploid embryos on the second PGD cycle conceived. The ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates in patients with at least one euploid embryo were 40% and 18%, respectively. Twelve of the 55 patients (22%) had no euploid embryos available for transfer on the first PGD cycle, but on the second PGD cycle, six (50%) of these had euploid embryos for transfer. Only two pregnancies were achieved among this group of women, yielding a pregnancy rate of 17%, but both conceptions resulted in miscarriage. Of the six patients with no euploid embryos available after the second PGD cycle, four patients had a third IVF/PGD cycle, but none had euploid embryos available for transfer. Also, among women with euploid embryos available only in either the first or second PGD cycle, but not both, no ongoing pregnancy was achieved. No woman who had a PGD cycle productive of no euploid embryos had an ongoing pregnancy. Significant differences were found in terms of ongoing pregnancy (40%, P<0.05) and implantation rates (18%, P<0.05) in women with euploid embryos available for transfer with the first and second IVF/PGD cycles, compared to women with no euploid embryos available for transfer with either the first or second cycle. The positive predictive value of the first euploid cycle predicting a second euploid cycle was 72%, 95% CI 0.66-0.78. The negative predictive value of an aneuploid cycle was 50%, 95% CI 0.27-0.72. The sensitivity and specificity of the first PGD cycle predicting the second was 84%, 95% CI 0.77-0.91 and 33%, 95% CI 0.18-0.48, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Even with a history of recurrent implantation failure, the availability of euploid embryos, especially on two, consecutive PGD cycles is associated with high ongoing pregnancy and implantation rates. Conversely, the absence of euploid embryos for transfer predicts poor reproductive outcome, even if subsequent cycles do yield euploid embryos.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18266102      PMCID: PMC2582115          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-008-9200-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  15 in total

1.  Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro.

Authors:  M C Magli; G M Jones; L Gras; L Gianaroli; I Korman; A O Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Catherine Staessen; Peter Platteau; Elvire Van Assche; An Michiels; Herman Tournaye; Michel Camus; Paul Devroey; Inge Liebaers; André Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis on IVF outcome in implantation failure patients.

Authors:  T Pehlivan; C Rubio; L Rodrigo; J Romero; J Remohi; C Simón; A Pellicer
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  M Sandalinas; S Sadowy; M Alikani; G Calderon; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; A P Ferraretti; A Fiorentino; J Garrisi; S Munné
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Jill Fischer; Alison Warner; Serena Chen; Christo Zouves; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in early human embryos: a review.

Authors:  Leeanda Wilton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Cristina Magli; Luca Gianaroli; Jacques Cohen; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure.

Authors:  L Voullaire; L Wilton; J McBain; T Callaghan; R Williamson
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Preimplantation diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in spontaneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22.

Authors:  S Munné; C Magli; M Bahçe; J Fung; M Legator; L Morrison; J Cohert; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  6 in total

1.  Gamete cytogenetic study in couples with implantation failure: aneuploidy rate is increased in both couple members.

Authors:  F Vialard; I Hammoud; D Molina-Gomes; R Wainer; M Bergere; M Albert; M Bailly; P de Mazancourt; J Selva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Jeani Chang; Sheree L Boulet; Gary Jeng; Lisa Flowers; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: an effective testing for infertile and repeated miscarriage patients?

Authors:  Ning Wang; Ying-Ming Zheng; Lei Li; Fan Jin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Does ICSI for in vitro fertilization cause more aneuploid embryos?

Authors:  Xiangli Niu; Jiamin Long; Fangqiang Gong; Weihua Wang
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Comparative genomic hybridization selection of blastocysts for repeated implantation failure treatment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Sara Bono; Alessandra Ruberti; Anna Maria Lobascio; Pierfrancesco Greco; Anil Biricik; Letizia Spizzichino; Alessia Greco; Jan Tesarik; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Preimplantation genetic screening for all 24 chromosomes by microarray comparative genomic hybridization significantly increases implantation rates and clinical pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Gaurav Majumdar; Abha Majumdar; Meena Lall; Ishwar C Verma; Kailash C Upadhyaya
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.