Literature DB >> 16452218

An integrated computational/experimental model of tumor invasion.

Hermann B Frieboes1, Xiaoming Zheng, Chung-Ho Sun, Bruce Tromberg, Robert Gatenby, Vittorio Cristini.   

Abstract

The intracellular and extracellular dynamics that govern tumor growth and invasiveness in vivo remain poorly understood. Cell genotype and phenotype, and nutrient, oxygen, and growth factor concentrations are key variables. In previous work, using a reaction-diffusion mathematical model based on variables that directly describe tumor cell cycle and biology, we formulated the hypothesis that tumor morphology is determined by the competition between heterogeneous cell proliferation caused by spatial diffusion gradients, e.g., of cell nutrients, driving shape instability and invasive tumor morphologies, and stabilizing mechanical forces, e.g., cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix adhesion. To test this hypothesis, we here obtain variable-based statistics for input to the mathematical model from in vitro human and rat glioblastoma cultures. A linear stability analysis of the model predicts that glioma spheroid morphology is marginally stable. In agreement with this prediction, for a range of variable values, unbounded growth of the tumor mass and invasion of the environment are observed in vitro. The mechanism of invasion is recursive subspheroid component development at the tumor viable rim and separation from the parent spheroid. Results of computer simulations of the mathematical model closely resemble the morphologies and spatial arrangement of tumor cells from the in vitro model. We propose that tumor morphogenesis in vivo may be a function of marginally stable environmental conditions caused by spatial variations in cell nutrients, oxygen, and growth factors, and that controlling these conditions by decreasing spatial gradients could benefit treatment outcomes, whereas current treatment, and especially antiangiogenic therapy, may trigger spatial heterogeneity (e.g., local hypoxia), thus causing invasive instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16452218     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  96 in total

1.  Improving the time-machine: estimating date of birth of grade II gliomas.

Authors:  C Gerin; J Pallud; B Grammaticos; E Mandonnet; C Deroulers; P Varlet; L Capelle; L Taillandier; L Bauchet; H Duffau; M Badoual
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  An Adaptive Multigrid Algorithm for Simulating Solid Tumor Growth Using Mixture Models.

Authors:  S M Wise; J S Lowengrub; V Cristini
Journal:  Math Comput Model       Date:  2011-01-01

3.  Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion, and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Mark Robertson-Tessi; Robert J Gillies; Robert A Gatenby; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Mathematical modeling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: biological insight from mathematical analysis and computational simulation.

Authors:  Vivi Andasari; Alf Gerisch; Georgios Lolas; Andrew P South; Mark A J Chaplain
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 5.  Predictive oncology: a review of multidisciplinary, multiscale in silico modeling linking phenotype, morphology and growth.

Authors:  Sandeep Sanga; Hermann B Frieboes; Xiaoming Zheng; Robert Gatenby; Elaine L Bearer; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Front instabilities and invasiveness of simulated avascular tumors.

Authors:  Nikodem J Popławski; Ubirajara Agero; J Scott Gens; Maciej Swat; James A Glazier; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Nonlinear studies of tumor morphological stability using a two-fluid flow model.

Authors:  Kara Pham; Emma Turian; Kai Liu; Shuwang Li; John Lowengrub
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Computer simulation of glioma growth and morphology.

Authors:  Hermann B Frieboes; John S Lowengrub; S Wise; X Zheng; Paul Macklin; Elaine L Bearer; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  In silico cancer modeling: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Thomas S Deisboeck; Le Zhang; Jeongah Yoon; Jose Costa
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-10-14

Review 10.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.