Literature DB >> 17629503

Predictive oncology: a review of multidisciplinary, multiscale in silico modeling linking phenotype, morphology and growth.

Sandeep Sanga1, Hermann B Frieboes, Xiaoming Zheng, Robert Gatenby, Elaine L Bearer, Vittorio Cristini.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence and theoretical studies suggest that the phenotype, i.e., cellular- and molecular-scale dynamics, including proliferation rate and adhesiveness due to microenvironmental factors and gene expression that govern tumor growth and invasiveness, also determine gross tumor-scale morphology. It has been difficult to quantify the relative effect of these links on disease progression and prognosis using conventional clinical and experimental methods and observables. As a result, successful individualized treatment of highly malignant and invasive cancers, such as glioblastoma, via surgical resection and chemotherapy cannot be offered and outcomes are generally poor. What is needed is a deterministic, quantifiable method to enable understanding of the connections between phenotype and tumor morphology. Here, we critically assess advantages and disadvantages of recent computational modeling efforts (e.g., continuum, discrete, and cellular automata models) that have pursued this understanding. Based on this assessment, we review a multiscale, i.e., from the molecular to the gross tumor scale, mathematical and computational "first-principle" approach based on mass conservation and other physical laws, such as employed in reaction-diffusion systems. Model variables describe known characteristics of tumor behavior, and parameters and functional relationships across scales are informed from in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo biology. We review the feasibility of this methodology that, once coupled to tumor imaging and tumor biopsy or cell culture data, should enable prediction of tumor growth and therapy outcome through quantification of the relation between the underlying dynamics and morphological characteristics. In particular, morphologic stability analysis of this mathematical model reveals that tumor cell patterning at the tumor-host interface is regulated by cell proliferation, adhesion and other phenotypic characteristics: histopathology information of tumor boundary can be inputted to the mathematical model and used as a phenotype-diagnostic tool to predict collective and individual tumor cell invasion of surrounding tissue. This approach further provides a means to deterministically test effects of novel and hypothetical therapy strategies on tumor behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629503      PMCID: PMC2245890          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  88 in total

1.  Mathematical modelling of the loss of tissue compression responsiveness and its role in solid tumour development.

Authors:  M A J Chaplain; L Graziano; L Preziosi
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Isolation and characterization of human malignant glioma cells from histologically normal brain.

Authors:  D L Silbergeld; M R Chicoine
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  The great escape: when cancer cells hijack the genes for chemotaxis and motility.

Authors:  John Condeelis; Robert H Singer; Jeffrey E Segall
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 13.827

4.  Mathematical modeling of capillary formation and development in tumor angiogenesis: penetration into the stroma.

Authors:  H A Levine; S Pamuk; B D Sleeman; M Nilsen-Hamilton
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  Clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects of cancer invasion.

Authors:  Marc Mareel; Ancy Leroy
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of cancer cell invasion and plasticity.

Authors:  Katarina Wolf; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Assessment of brain tumor cell motility in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  M R Chicoine; D L Silbergeld
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  The glycolytic phenotype in carcinogenesis and tumor invasion: insights through mathematical models.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Edward T Gawlinski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Invasion as limitation to anti-angiogenic glioma therapy.

Authors:  K Lamszus; P Kunkel; M Westphal
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2003

10.  Molecular determinants of human uveal melanoma invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Seftor; Paul S Meltzer; Dawn A Kirschmann; Jacob Pe'er; Andrew J Maniotis; Jeffrey M Trent; Robert Folberg; Mary J C Hendrix
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.150

View more
  53 in total

1.  An Adaptive Multigrid Algorithm for Simulating Solid Tumor Growth Using Mixture Models.

Authors:  S M Wise; J S Lowengrub; V Cristini
Journal:  Math Comput Model       Date:  2011-01-01

2.  Coupled mathematical model of tumorigenesis and angiogenesis in vascular tumours.

Authors:  M D Cooper; M L Tanaka; I K Puri
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  A radiobiological model of radiotherapy response and its correlation with prognostic imaging variables.

Authors:  Mireia Crispin-Ortuzar; Jeho Jeong; Andrew N Fontanella; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Multiparameter computational modeling of tumor invasion.

Authors:  Elaine L Bearer; John S Lowengrub; Hermann B Frieboes; Yao-Li Chuang; Fang Jin; Steven M Wise; Mauro Ferrari; David B Agus; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Cellular modeling of cancer invasion: integration of in silico and in vitro approaches.

Authors:  Yoonseok Kam; Katarzyna A Rejniak; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  A 2D mechanistic model of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) morphology and progression.

Authors:  Kerri-Ann Norton; Michael Wininger; Gyan Bhanot; Shridar Ganesan; Nicola Barnard; Troy Shinbrot
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  In silico cancer modeling: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Thomas S Deisboeck; Le Zhang; Jeongah Yoon; Jose Costa
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-10-14

Review 9.  An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response.

Authors:  Benjamin Titz; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  A computational approach to resolve cell level contributions to early glandular epithelial cancer progression.

Authors:  Sean H J Kim; Jayanta Debnath; Keith Mostov; Sunwoo Park; C Anthony Hunt
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2009-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.