Literature DB >> 16448629

Manual response preparation and saccade programming are linked to attention shifts: ERP evidence for covert attentional orienting and spatially specific modulations of visual processing.

Martin Eimer1, José Van Velzen, Elena Gherri, Clare Press.   

Abstract

The premotor theory of attention claims that attentional shifts are triggered during response programming, regardless of which response modality is involved. To investigate this claim, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants covertly prepared a left or right response, as indicated by a precue presented at the beginning of each trial. Cues signalled a left or right eye movement in the saccade task, and a left or right manual response in the manual task. The cued response had to be executed or withheld following the presentation of a Go/Nogo stimulus. Although there were systematic differences between ERPs triggered during covert manual and saccade preparation, lateralised ERP components sensitive to the direction of a cued response were very similar for both tasks, and also similar to the components previously found during cued shifts of endogenous spatial attention. This is consistent with the claim that the control of attention and of covert response preparation are closely linked. N1 components triggered by task-irrelevant visual probes presented during the covert response preparation interval were enhanced when these probes were presented close to cued response hand in the manual task, and at the saccade target location in the saccade task. This demonstrates that both manual and saccade preparation result in spatially specific modulations of visual processing, in line with the predictions of the premotor theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16448629     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  19 in total

1.  The presence of visual gap affects the duration of stopping process.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fixation disengagement enhances peripheral perceptual processing: evidence for a perceptual gap effect.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sustained visuospatial attention enhances lateralized anticipatory ERP activity in sensory areas.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Marika Berchicci; Valentina Bianco; Elena Mussini; Rinaldo Livio Perri; Sabrina Pitzalis; Federico Quinzi; Sara Tranquilli; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Oculomotor interference during manual response preparation: evidence from the response-cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Jos J Adam
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual target selection and motor planning define attentional enhancement at perceptual processing stages.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Heed; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Manual response preparation disrupts spatial attention: an electrophysiological investigation of links between action and attention.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  The instructed context of a motor task modulates covert response preparation and shifts of spatial attention.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; José Van Velzen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Rhythmic oscillations of visual contrast sensitivity synchronized with action.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Donatella Spinelli; Marco Jacono; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Eye movement preparation causes spatially-specific modulation of auditory processing: new evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Jon Driver; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.