Literature DB >> 19496233

The instructed context of a motor task modulates covert response preparation and shifts of spatial attention.

Elena Gherri1, José Van Velzen, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

We investigated how covert response preparation is modulated by the instructed cognitive context of a motor task. Participants prepared left-hand or right-hand movements toward or away from the body midline, as indicated by a response cue (S1) presented prior to a go/no-go stimulus (S2). Different participants were instructed that response cues specified the response hand or movement direction, respectively. This emphasis on effector versus movement direction selection modulated lateralized ERP components triggered during the S1-S2 interval. Attention shifts during movement preparation were assessed by measuring ERPs to irrelevant visual probes. Enhanced N1 components were found for probes near the effector when effector selection was emphasized, but for probes near the movement target location when movement direction selection was emphasized. Results demonstrate strong top-down contextual biases on motor control and on the locus of spatial attention during response preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19496233      PMCID: PMC2781104          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00800.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  37 in total

1.  The dynamics of shifting visuospatial attention revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  A C Nobre; G N Sebestyen; C Miniussi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The Organization of the Frontal Motor Cortex.

Authors:  G. Luppino; G. Rizzolatti
Journal:  News Physiol Sci       Date:  2000-10

Review 3.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; José van Velzen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Preparation for movement: neural representations of intended direction in three motor areas of the monkey.

Authors:  G E Alexander; M D Crutcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster; José Van Velzen; Gita Prabhu
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Lateralised cortical activity due to preparation of saccades and finger movements: a comparative study.

Authors:  B Wauschkuhn; E Wascher; R Verleger
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02

9.  Deciding not to GO: neuronal correlates of response selection in a GO/NOGO task in primate premotor and parietal cortex.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; D J Crammond
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  R A Andersen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  6 in total

1.  Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Tobias Heed; Charles Spence; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential functional roles of slow-wave and oscillatory-α activity in visual sensory cortex during anticipatory visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; C Nicolas Boehler; J Leon Kenemans; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Manual response preparation disrupts spatial attention: an electrophysiological investigation of links between action and attention.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the "broken escalator" phenomenon using anodal tDCS.

Authors:  D Kaski; S Quadir; M Patel; N Yousif; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The influence of motor preparation on the processing of action-relevant visual features.

Authors:  Xavier Job; Mara Golemme; Joydeep Bhattacharya; Marinella Cappelletti; Jan de Fockert; Jose van Velzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.