Literature DB >> 16447472

The rate of adenocarcinoma in endoscopically removed colorectal polyps.

Stephen R Odom1, Stephen D Duffy, James E Barone, Vishal Ghevariya, Steven J McClane.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of cancer in a modern series of colorectal polyps. All pathology reports from colon and rectal polyps from 1999 to 2002 were reviewed. Reports of bowel resections, cancer-free polyps, and polyp-free mucosal biopsies were excluded. Polyps were grouped by size, and the rate of adenocarcinoma was determined. x2 was used for analysis. A total of 4,443 polyps were found, of which 3,225 were adenomatous [2,883 (89.4%) tubular adenomas, 399 (9.3%) tubulo-villous adenomas, 32 (1.0%) villous adenomas, and 11 (0.3%) carcinomas]. The rate of adenocarcinoma by size was 0.07 per cent for polyps <1 cm, 2.41 per cent for polyps 1-2 cm, and 19.35 per cent for polyps >2 cm, representing significantly fewer cancers for each category of polyp size than the accepted standard. The rate of carcinoma in colon polyps is much lower than previously thought and currently stated in many texts. These data do not alter the recommendations for polyp removal, however, failure to retrieve a specimen in a polyp <1 cm in size is unlikely to have an adverse outcome because the chances of malignancy are very low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16447472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Virtual colonoscopy vs optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Liang; Robert Richards
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  An evidence-based microsimulation model for colorectal cancer: validation and application.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; James E Savarino
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Ian M Thompson; Brian Reid; Peter Nelson; David F Ransohoff; H Gilbert Welch; Shelley Hwang; Donald A Berry; Kenneth W Kinzler; William C Black; Mina Bissell; Howard Parnes; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Bayesian Calibration of Microsimulation Models.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Diana L Miglioretti; James E Savarino
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Colonic polyp histopathology and location in a community-based sample of older adults.

Authors:  Heather S Laird-Fick; Gurveen Chahal; Ade Olomu; Joseph Gardiner; James Richard; Nikolay Dimitrov
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Polyp Resection - Controversial Practices and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Use of endoscopic distal attachment cap to enhance image stabilization in probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Vivian Ussui; Can Xu; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Joy Hardee; Estela G Staggs; Muhammad W Shahid; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-07-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.