Literature DB >> 16447048

Prostate biopsy in the supine position in a standard 1.5-T scanner under real time MR-imaging control using a MR-compatible endorectal biopsy device.

K Engelhard1, H P Hollenbach, B Kiefer, A Winkel, K Goeb, D Engehausen.   

Abstract

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with elevated PSA levels and negative tumor prostate biopsies underwent a MR-guided prostate biopsy in a 1.5-T scanner in the supine position. After localization of suspected tumor areas using an endorectal coil and two body-phased array coils, the biopsy device was positioned without any repositioning of the patient. The biopsy device consisted of a mount, a ball joint, a positioning stage and an insertion stage with a needle guide, which was filled with a MR-visible fluid to control positioning of the needle using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence (TrueFISP) and a high-resolution turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) sequence. Core biopsies were taken manually in the magnet. The biopsy needle could be correctly positioned in all cases. Suspected lesions with a diameter > or =10 mm could be successfully punctured. Four to nine (mean = 6) biopsies were taken per patient. In 14 patients, prostate cancer was confirmed at histology. Twenty-four biopsies positive for cancer were performed in 14 patients. A correct correlation was found between the site of biopsy and histology. MR-guided prostate biopsy can be effective in increasing primary positive tumor biopsy results in patients with a history of negative tumor TRUS-guided prostate biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16447048     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0100-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Analysis of recent trends in prostate cancer incidence and mortality.

Authors:  L K Dennis; M I Resnick
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Combination of signal intensity measurements of lesions in the peripheral zone of prostate with MRI and serum PSA level for differentiating benign disease from prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Engelhard; H P Hollenbach; M Deimling; M Kreckel; C Riedl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.

Authors:  J Rørvik; S Haukaas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer.

Authors:  S Ikonen; P Kärkkäinen; L Kivisaari; J O Salo; K Taari; T Vehmas; P Tervahartiala; S Rannikko
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology.

Authors:  A E Wefer; H Hricak; D B Vigneron; F V Coakley; Y Lu; J Wefer; U Mueller-Lisse; P R Carroll; J Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  J C Vilanova; J Comet; A Capdevila; J Barceló; J L Dolz; M Huguet; C Barceló; J Aldomà; E Delgado
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Kerstin Engelmann; Mukhtiar Ahmed; Sebastian Dettmer; Christopher Herzog; Wasilios Pegios; A Wetter; Thomas Lehnert; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session.

Authors:  Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makoto Ohori; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Mithat Gonen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  The value of endorectal MRI in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Comet-Batlle; J C Vilanova-Busquets; J M Saladié-Roig; A Gelabert-Mas; C Barceló-Vidal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Matthias Lichy; Rainer Grobholz; Melanie Heilmann; Nabeel Farhan; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan; Joerg Ederle; Ulrich Abel; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Wolfhard Semmler; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  42 in total

Review 1.  Robotic prostate biopsy and its relevance to focal therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Henry Ho; John S P Yuen; Christopher W S Cheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  [MRI navigated stereotactic prostate biopsy: fusion of MRI and real-time transrectal ultrasound images for perineal prostate biopsies].

Authors:  T H Kuru; C Tulea; T Simpfendörfer; V Popeneciu; M Roethke; B A Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy.

Authors:  M Roethke; A G Anastasiadis; M Lichy; M Werner; P Wagner; S Kruck; Claus D Claussen; A Stenzl; H P Schlemmer; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Standardised scoring of a multi-parametric 3-T MRI for a targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy].

Authors:  C Arsov; D Blondin; R Rabenalt; G Antoch; P Albers; M Quentin
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  An MRI-compatible robotic system with hybrid tracking for MRI-guided prostate intervention.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Iulian I Iordachita; Peter Guion; Anurag K Singh; Aradhana Kaushal; Cynthia Ménard; Peter A Pinto; Kevin Camphausen; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Anatomic and Molecular Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eric T Miller; Amirali Salmasi; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  MR-guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Clare Tempany; Sarah Straus; Nobuhiko Hata; Steven Haker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Development and Evaluation of an Actuated MRI-Compatible Robotic System for MRI-Guided Prostate Intervention.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Sang-Eun Song; Nathan B Cho; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Guion; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.303

9.  Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Kinzya B Grant; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Template for MR Visualization and Needle Targeting.

Authors:  Rui Li; Sheng Xu; Ivane Bakhutashvili; Ismail B Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford Wood; Zion T H Tse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.