Literature DB >> 9474182

Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer.

S Ikonen1, P Kärkkäinen, L Kivisaari, J O Salo, K Taari, T Vehmas, P Tervahartiala, S Rannikko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assess the accuracy of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting tumor localization, capsular penetration and seminal vesicle invasion in clinically organ confined prostate cancer. We also evaluate intra-observer and interobserver agreement in interpreting MRI studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI studies of 51 consecutive patients a mean of 61 years old with biopsy proved prostate cancer were retrospectively read twice by 2 radiologists in random order. Both radiologists marked tumor localization, capsular penetration and seminal vesicle invasion on standard tumor maps. These findings were compared with the histopathological results of radical prostatectomy specimens.
RESULTS: The overall accuracy of detecting cancer localization was 61%. The detection rate for cancer foci less than 5 mm. was only 5% but for lesions greater than 10 mm. it was 89%. There was 91 and 80% accuracy for detecting capsular penetration and seminal vesicle invasion, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 60 and 63, 13 and 97, and 59 and 84% for localization, capsular penetration and seminal vesicle invasion, respectively. Intra-observer and interobserver agreement ranged from fair to good (kappa coefficient 0.240 to 0.647).
CONCLUSIONS: Endorectal MRI seems to be better than previously reported for detecting seminal vesicle invasion and tumor foci in the anterior half of the prostate. Sensitivity in detecting minor capsular penetration of the tumor was low, which can probably be improved by methodological development. MRI may be useful for locating cancer foci in patients with high prostate specific antigen values but repeatedly negative biopsy findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9474182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  S N Pentyala; J Lee; K Hsieh; W C Waltzer; A Trocchia; L Musacchia; M J Rebecchi; S A Khan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Prediction of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with high spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced 3-T MRI.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Elizabeth M Genega; Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Martin P Smith; Herbert Y Kressel; Long Ngo; Martin G Sanda; William C Dewolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Two-dimensional MR spectroscopy of healthy and cancerous prostates in vivo.

Authors:  M Albert Thomas; Thomas Lange; S Sendhil Velan; Rajakumar Nagarajan; Steve Raman; Ana Gomez; Daniel Margolis; Stephany Swart; Raymond R Raylman; Rolf F Schulte; Peter Boesiger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Kirkham; Manit Arya; Rowland Illing; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Fatma Nur Soylu; Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Shiyang Wang; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Ila Sethi; Scott Eggener; Tatjana Antic; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  [Innovative concepts in early cancer detection and staging of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Rinnab; R Küfer; R E Hautmann; B G Volkmer; M Straub; N M Blumstein; H W Gottfried
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Prostate cancer: serum and tissue markers.

Authors:  G J Miller; M K Brawer; W A Sakr; J B Thrasher; R Townsend
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

8.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Kerstin Engelmann; Mukhtiar Ahmed; Sebastian Dettmer; Christopher Herzog; Wasilios Pegios; A Wetter; Thomas Lehnert; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Registering histologic and MR images of prostate for image-based cancer detection.

Authors:  Yiqiang Zhan; Yangming Ou; Michael Feldman; John Tomaszeweski; Christos Davatzikos; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Friedrich Aigner; Leo Pallwein; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Schaefer; Georg Bartsch; Dieter zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.