Literature DB >> 12969351

Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery.

R Malik1, P S White, C J Macewen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the nature of active skill-based errors occurring in endoscopic dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. A human reliability analysis methodology was used to assess surgical error from observational capture data. Twelve endoscopic DCR operations performed by three different surgical trainees were video recorded. The steps (subtasks) of each operation were carefully analysed and common errors were documented. Specific errors that resulted in trauma to the nasal mucosa were noted. Execution errors were common, with errors of grasping being most frequent (67% of all execution errors). Most of these involved the Blakesley forceps. In total, there were 69 mucosal trauma hits. Inserting instruments into or withdrawing them from the nasal cavity with too much force or speed caused more than half of these. Incising with too much force resulting in 'overshoot' caused 34% of mucosal trauma. Trainee ENT surgeons should take particular care when inserting or withdrawing instruments from the nasal cavity and also when performing lacrimal sac or nasal mucosa incisions. Performance of these tasks with too much force was identified as a common and potentially avoidable cause of mucosal trauma. Further research is needed into the design and use of endoscopic sinus surgery instruments with the aim of avoiding the errors that were encountered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12969351     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00745.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  7 in total

1.  Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Hwang; J Lim; C Kinnaird; A G Nagy; O N M Panton; A J Hodgson; K A Qayumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.

Authors:  S K Sarker; R Hutchinson; A Chang; C Vincent; A W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Pierre Jannin; Juliane Schlomberg; Jürgen Meixensberger; Peter Wiedemann; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Identification of surgeon-individual treatment profiles to support the provision of an optimum treatment service for cataract patients.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Renate Wiedemann; Christian Foja; Petra Meier; Juliane Schlomberg; Dayana Neumuth; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor       Date:  2011-04-13

6.  Development of Surgical Error Reduction System (SERS) for Laparoscopic Appendectomy by using Observational Human Reliability Analysis (OCHRA) model and to analyse its impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Girivasan Muthukumarasamy; Samer Zino; Benjie Tang; Pradeep Patil
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2022-09-21

7.  Objective assessment of surgical operative performance by observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA): a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjie Tang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.