Literature DB >> 11967678

Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures.

N Y Mehta1, R S Haluck, M I Frecker, A J Snyder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the area of instrument evaluation, one aspect that still requires objective assessment is the dynamics of instrument maneuver and exchange. If we could gain a better understanding of these phenomena, we could improve the design of the instruments themselves.
METHODS: A total of 29 laparoscopic procedures were videotaped and reviewed using time motion analysis. Instrument multifunctionality was determined using a standardized list of laparoscopic maneuvers. State transition diagrams were utilized to document the sequence of instrument exchanges.
RESULTS: The curved dissector, atraumatic grasper, and cautery scissors were identified as the most multifunctional instruments; each was able to perform five distinct maneuvers. Instrument sequences were found to consist of a three-part dissect --> clip --> cut cycle and a two-part dissect --> suction cycle of instrument exchange.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that laparoscopic instruments are often used to perform a variety of maneuvers in addition to their primary function. Furthermore, there are common patterns in instrument exchange that provide a potential source of design parameters for improved surgical efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11967678     DOI: 10.1007/s004640080009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Self-appraisal hierarchical task analysis of laparoscopic surgery performed by expert surgeons.

Authors:  S K Sarker; R Hutchinson; A Chang; C Vincent; A W Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Shortened OR time and decreased patient risk through use of a modular surgical instrument with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  David J Miller; Carl A Nelson; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Surgical process modelling: a review.

Authors:  Florent Lalys; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Automatic phase prediction from low-level surgical activities.

Authors:  Germain Forestier; Laurent Riffaud; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Pierre Jannin; Juliane Schlomberg; Jürgen Meixensberger; Peter Wiedemann; Oliver Burgert
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Surgical skills: Can learning curves be computed from recordings of surgical activities?

Authors:  Germain Forestier; Laurent Riffaud; François Petitjean; Pierre-Louis Henaux; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Identification of surgeon-individual treatment profiles to support the provision of an optimum treatment service for cataract patients.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth; Renate Wiedemann; Christian Foja; Petra Meier; Juliane Schlomberg; Dayana Neumuth; Peter Wiedemann
Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor       Date:  2011-04-13

8.  Analysis of laparoscopic dissection skill by instrument tip force measurement.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshida; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Yoshihiro Kuroda; Osamu Oshiro; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Artificial hand for minimally invasive surgery: design and testing of initial prototype.

Authors:  Jennifer E Rosen; Aaron Size; Yuzhang Yang; Andre Sharon; Alexis Sauer-Budge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic multifunctional instruments: design and testing of initial prototypes.

Authors:  Mary I Frecker; Jeremy Schadler; Randy S Haluck; Kristin Culkar; Ryan Dziedzic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.