Literature DB >> 16443528

Prospective comparison of echocardiographic atrioventricular delay optimization methods for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Jeffrey E Kerlan1, Navinder S Sawhney, Alan D Waggoner, Mohit K Chawla, Sanjeev Garhwal, Judy L Osborn, Mitchell N Faddis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) delay optimization can be an important determinant of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with medically refractory heart failure and a ventricular conduction delay.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare two Doppler echocardiographic methods of AV delay optimization after CRT.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients (age 59 +/- 12 years) with severe heart failure, New York Heart Association class 3.1 +/- 0.4, QRS duration 177 +/- 23 ms, and left ventricular ejection fraction 26% +/- 6% referred for CRT were studied using two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography. In each patient, the acute improvement in stroke volume with CRT in response to two methods of AV delay optimization was compared. In the first method, the AV delay that produced the largest increase in the aortic velocity time integral (VTI) derived from continuous-wave Doppler (aortic VTI method) was measured. In the second method, the AV delay that optimized the timing of mitral valve closure to occur simultaneously with the onset of left ventricular systole was calculated from pulsed Doppler mitral waveforms at a short and long AV delay interval (mitral inflow method).
RESULTS: The optimized AV delay determined by the aortic VTI method resulted in an increase in aortic VTI of 19% +/- 13% compared with an increase of 12% +/- 12% by the mitral inflow method (P <.001). The optimized AV delay by the aortic VTI method was significantly longer than the optimized AV delay calculated from the mitral inflow method (119 +/- 34 ms vs 95 +/- 24 ms, P <.001). There was no correlation in the AV delay determined by the two methods (r = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: AV delay optimization by Doppler echocardiography for patients with severe heart failure treated with a CRT device yields a greater systolic improvement when guided by the aortic VTI method compared with the mitral inflow method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16443528     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  18 in total

1.  AV interval optimization using pressure volume loops in dual chamber pacemaker patients with maintained systolic left ventricular function.

Authors:  Frank Eberhardt; Thorsten Hanke; Joern Fitschen; Matthias Heringlake; Frank Bode; Heribert Schunkert; Uwe K H Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David Birnie; Rob A de Kemp; Anthony S Tang; Terence D Ruddy; Michael H Gollob; Ann Guo; Kathryn Williams; Kerry Thomson; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy after implantation.

Authors:  Ayesha Hasan; William T Abraham
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-08

4.  Sex differences in optimal atrioventricular delay in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mariëlle Kloosterman; Alexander H Maass
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  The reliability of cardiogenic impedance and correlation with echocardiographic and plethysmographic parameters for predicting CRT time intervals post implantation.

Authors:  Elena Sciaraffia; Matthew R Ginks; John Gustafsson; Andreas Karlsson; C Aldo Rinaldi; Carina Blomström Lundqvist
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Doppler echocardiographic methods for optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Alan D Waggoner; Lisa de las Fuentes; Victor G Davila-Roman
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Non-invasive determination of the optimized atrioventricular delay in patients with implanted biventricular pacing devices.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Thomas Lawo; Stefan von Dryander; Peter Hubert Grewe; Alfried Germing; Eduard Gorr; Peter Hubben; Andreas Mugge; Dong-In Shin; Bernd Lemke
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-02-01

8.  SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison of AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV): rationale and design.

Authors:  Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Michael R Gold; Bernd Lemke; Ignacio Fernández Lozano; Suneet Mittal; Francis G Spinale; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Alan D Waggoner; Timothy E Meyer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Interatrial conduction time and left atrial function in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Alan D Waggoner; Sujith Kalathiveetil; Karen E Spence; Víctor G Dávila-Román; Lisa de las Fuentes
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Influence of atrioventricular optimization on hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with dual chamber pacemaker with ventricular lead in right ventricular outflow tract.

Authors:  Artur Klimczak; Adam S Budzikowski; Marcin Rosiak; Marzenna Zielińska; Bożena Urbanek; Karol Bartczak; Michał Chudzik; Jerzy K Wranicz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.