Literature DB >> 22402713

AV interval optimization using pressure volume loops in dual chamber pacemaker patients with maintained systolic left ventricular function.

Frank Eberhardt1, Thorsten Hanke, Joern Fitschen, Matthias Heringlake, Frank Bode, Heribert Schunkert, Uwe K H Wiegand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) interval optimization is often deemed too time-consuming in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with maintained LV function. Thus the majority of patients are left at their default AV interval.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the magnitude of hemodynamic improvement following AV interval optimization in chronically paced dual chamber pacemaker patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pressure volume catheter was placed in the left ventricle of 19 patients with chronic dual chamber pacing and an ejection fraction >45 % undergoing elective coronary angiography. AV interval was varied in 10 ms steps from 80 to 300 ms, and pressure volume loops were recorded during breath hold.
RESULTS: The average optimal AV interval was 152 ± 39 ms compared to 155 ± 8 ms for the average default AV interval (range 100-240 ms). The average improvement in stroke work following AV interval optimization was 935 ± 760 mmHg/ml (range 0-2,908; p < 0.001), which translates into an average improvement of 14 ± 9 % (range 0-28). A 10 ms variation of the AV interval changes the average stroke work by 207 ± 162 mmHg/ml. AV interval optimization also leads to improved systolic dyssynchrony indices (17.7 ± 7.0 vs. 19.4 ± 7.1 %; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The overall hemodynamic effect of AV interval optimization in patients with maintained LV function is in the same range as for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy for several parameters. The positive effect of AV interval optimization also applies to patients who have been chronically paced for years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402713     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-012-0439-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  28 in total

1.  Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  Panos E Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Jean-Claude Daubert; Helmut Drexler; Hugo Ector; Maurizio Gasparini; Cecilia Linde; Francisco Bello Morgado; Ali Oto; Richard Sutton; Maria Trusz-Gluza
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  The basic pacing rate in CRT patients: the higher the better?

Authors:  Frederik Voss; Ruediger Becker; Melanie Hauck; Hugo A Katus; Alexander Bauer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Echocardiographic optimization of the atrioventricular and interventricular intervals during cardiac resynchronization.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Arzu Ilercil; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Echocardiographic study of the optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.

Authors:  Bilel Mokrani; Stephane Lafitte; Antoine Deplagne; Sylvain Ploux; Julien Laborderie; Patricia Reant; Pierre Dos Santos; Raymond Roudaut; Pierre Jais; Michel Haissaguerre; Jacques Clementy; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Programming optimal atrioventricular delay in dual chamber pacing using peak endocardial acceleration: comparison with a standard echocardiographic procedure.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dupuis; Adonis Kobeissi; Luca Vitali; Guido Gaggini; Michel Merheb; Frederic Rouleau; Georges Leftheriotis; Philippe Ritter; Jacques Victor
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Effects of variation of atrioventricular interval on left ventricular diastolic filling dynamics and atrial natriuretic peptide levels in patients with DDD pacing for complete heart block.

Authors:  Ioannis H Styliadis; Nikolaos I Gouzoumas; Haralambos I Karvounis; Christodoulos E Papadopoulos; Georgios K Efthimiadis; Mihail Karamouzis; Georgios E Parharidis; Georgios E Louridas
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Doppler index and plasma level of atrial natriuretic hormone are improved by optimizing atrioventricular delay in atrioventricular block patients with implanted DDD pacemakers.

Authors:  N Toda; T Ishikawa; N Nozawa; I Kobayashi; H Ochiai; K Miyamoto; S Sumita; K Kimura; S Umemura
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Impact of moderate exercise workload on predicted optimal AV and VV delays determined by an intracardiac electrogram-based method for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Margit Strauss; Torsten Becker; Thomas Kleemann; Ngoc Dyck; Frank Birkenhauer; Karlheinz Seidl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  The effect of biventricular pacing on cardiac function after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with reduced left ventricular function: a pressure-volume loop analysis.

Authors:  Thorsten Hanke; Martin Misfeld; Matthias Heringlake; Jan J Schreuder; Uwe K H Wiegand; Frank Eberhardt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Walter J Paulus; Carsten Tschöpe; John E Sanderson; Cesare Rusconi; Frank A Flachskampf; Frank E Rademakers; Paolo Marino; Otto A Smiseth; Gilles De Keulenaer; Adelino F Leite-Moreira; Attila Borbély; István Edes; Martin Louis Handoko; Stephane Heymans; Natalia Pezzali; Burkert Pieske; Kenneth Dickstein; Alan G Fraser; Dirk L Brutsaert
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of left ventricular conduction defect with or without need for permanent right ventricular pacing on functional and clinical recovery after TAVR.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Eva Brüggemann; Robert Schueler; Diana Momcilovic; Jan-Malte Sinning; Alexander Ghanem; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Wolfgang Schiller; Fritz Mellert; Armin Welz; Georg Nickenig; Christoph Hammerstingl
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Not left ventricular lead position, but the extent of immediate asynchrony reduction predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wolfram C Poller; Henryk Dreger; Marius Schwerg; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.460

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.