Literature DB >> 24597906

Influence of atrioventricular optimization on hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with dual chamber pacemaker with ventricular lead in right ventricular outflow tract.

Artur Klimczak1, Adam S Budzikowski, Marcin Rosiak, Marzenna Zielińska, Bożena Urbanek, Karol Bartczak, Michał Chudzik, Jerzy K Wranicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether individual atrioventricular delay (AVD) optimization using impedance cardiography (ICG) offers beneficial hemodynamic effects as well as improved exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with requiring constant right ventricular pacing.
METHODS: There were 37 patients with advanced AV block included in the study. Several examinations were performed at the beginning. Next, the optimization of AVD by ICG was done. The next step of the study patients have been randomized into optimal AVD group (AVDopt) or factory setting group (AVDfab). After 3 months, the follow-up all data were collected again and crossover was performed. After another 3 months, during the final follow-up all these measures were repeated.
RESULTS: In 87.5% patients, AVDopt were different than factory value. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in AVDopt group than in AVDfab group (CO: 6.0 ± 1.4 L/minute vs. 5.3 ± 1.2 L/minute; SV: 85.8 ± 25.7 mL vs.76.9 ± 22.5 mL; CI: 3.2 ± 0.7 L/minute/m(2) vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 L/minute/m(2) ). There was a statistical significant (P < 0.05) reduction of proBNP and NYHA class in patients with AVDopt compared to AVDfab (proBNP: 196.4 ± 144.7pg/mL vs. 269.4 ± 235.8 pg/mL; NYHA class: 1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6). Six-minute walking test was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in AVDopt group (409 ± 90 m) than in AVDfab group (362 ± 93 m). There were no statistically significant differences in echocardiographic parameters between AVDopt and AVDfab settings.
CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that AVD optimization in patients with DDD pacemaker with ICG improves hemodynamic when compared to the default factory settings. Furthermore, optimally programmed AVD reduces BNP and improves exercise tolerance and functional class.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrioventricular block; atrioventricular delay; impedance cardiography; optimization; pacing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24597906      PMCID: PMC6932620          DOI: 10.1111/anec.12147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  28 in total

1.  Optimization of the atrioventricular delay during cardiac resynchronization therapy using a device for non-invasive measurement of cardiac index at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Dirk Prochnau; Thomas Forberg; Helmut Kühnert; Matthias Heinke; Hans R Figulla; Ralf Surber
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 2.  Randomized trials for selective site pacing: do we know where we are going?

Authors:  Michael D Gammage; Anna-Marie Marsh
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Right atrial pacing impairs cardiac function during resynchronization therapy: acute effects of DDD pacing compared to VDD pacing.

Authors:  Alain Bernheim; Peter Ammann; Christian Sticherling; Peter Burger; Beat Schaer; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Jens Eckstein; Stephanie Kiencke; Christoph Kaiser; Andre Linka; Peter Buser; Matthias Pfisterer; Stefan Osswald
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Pacing the right ventricular outflow tract septum: time to embrace the future.

Authors:  Richard J Hillock; Harry G Mond
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve Doppler versus impedance cardiography.

Authors:  M Kindermann; G Fröhlig; T Doerr; H Schieffer
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  The importance of the left atrioventricular interval during atrioventricular sequential pacing.

Authors:  S Chevalier; M Basta; J W Leitch
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakers.

Authors:  M Wish; R D Fletcher; J S Gottdiener; A I Cohen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.

Authors:  I Ovsyshcher; R Zimlichman; A Katz; C Bondy; S Furman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacing.

Authors:  D L Janosik; A C Pearson; T A Buckingham; A J Labovitz; R M Redd
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Selective site pacing: defining and reaching the selected site.

Authors:  Randy Lieberman; David Grenz; Harry G Mond; Michael D Gammage
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.