Literature DB >> 22160630

Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

David Birnie1, Rob A de Kemp, Anthony S Tang, Terence D Ruddy, Michael H Gollob, Ann Guo, Kathryn Williams, Kerry Thomson, Jean N DaSilva, Rob S Beanlands.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients do not respond to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). Recent work has focused on quantifying mechanical dyssynchrony and left ventricular scar. Septal reverse-mismatch (R-MM) (reduced FDG uptake vs perfusion) has been observed in patients with cardiomyopathy and prolonged QRS duration. We hypothesized that a greater quantity of septal R-MM would indicate a greater potential for reversibility of the cardiomyopathy, when the dyssynchrony is improved with CRT. Therefore, this study's objective was to assess whether greater septal R-MM pattern predicts response to CRT. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients had pre-implant Rubidium-82 and Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Total and regional left ventricular scar size and extent of R-MM were calculated. Response to CRT was defined as ≥10% improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume or ≥5% absolute ejection fraction improvement. In the non-ischemic cardiomyopathy subset non-responders had significantly less septal R-MM than responders (13.1% compared to 27.1%, P = .012). There were correlations between the extent of septal R-MM and the increase in ejection fraction (r = 0.692, P = .0004) and reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (r = -0.579, P = .004). For each 5% absolute increase in extent of septal R-MM the odds ratio of being a responder was 2.17 (95% CI 1.15, 4.11, P = .017). Extent of septal R-MM displayed high sensitivity and specificity (area under curve = 0.855, P = .017) to predict response.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, greater extent of septal glucose metabolic R-MM pattern, predicted response to CRT. This parameter may be useful for identifying patients who benefit from CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22160630     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9483-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  41 in total

Review 1.  Is nuclear imaging a viable alternative technique to assess dyssynchrony?

Authors:  Ji Chen; Jeroen J Bax; Maureen M Henneman; Mark J Boogers; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Utility of comprehensive assessment of strain dyssynchrony index by speckle tracking imaging for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Tatsumi; Hidekazu Tanaka; Kouhei Yamawaki; Keiko Ryo; Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar; Yuko Fukuda; Kazuko Norisada; Kensuke Matsumoto; Tetsuari Onishi; John Gorcsan; Akihiro Yoshida; Hiroya Kawai; Ken-ichi Hirata
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Reverse perfusion-metabolism mismatch predicts good prognosis in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Noriko Inoue; Nobukazu Takahashi; Toshiyuki Ishikawa; Shinichi Sumita; Tsukasa Kobayashi; Kohei Matsushita; Katsumi Matsumoto; Minoru Taima; Miei Shimura; Kazuaki Uchino; Kazuo Kimura; Tomio Inoue; Satoshi Umemura
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.993

4.  Effects of left bundle branch block on myocardial FDG PET in patients without significant coronary artery stenoses.

Authors:  P Zanco; A Desideri; G Mobilia; S Cargnel; E Milan; L Celegon; R Buchberger; G Ferlin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  The problem of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David H Birnie; Anthony Sl Tang
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 6.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy and implantable cardiac defibrillators in left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Finlay A McAlister; Justin Ezekowitz; Donna M Dryden; Nicola Hooton; Ben Vandermeer; Carol Friesen; Carol Spooner; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2007-06

7.  F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2).

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; Graham Nichol; Ella Huszti; Dennis Humen; Normand Racine; Michael Freeman; Karen Y Gulenchyn; Linda Garrard; Robert deKemp; Ann Guo; Terrence D Ruddy; Francois Benard; André Lamy; Robert M Iwanochko
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Positron emission tomography and recovery following revascularization (PARR-1): the importance of scar and the development of a prediction rule for the degree of recovery of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Robert M Iwanochko; Geoffrey Coates; Michael Freeman; Claude Nahmias; Paul Hendry; Robert J Burns; Andre Lamy; Lynda Mickleborough; William Kostuk; Ernest Fallen; Graham Nichol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  An accurate means of detecting and characterizing abnormal patterns of ventricular activation by phase image analysis.

Authors:  E H Botvinick; M A Frais; D W Shosa; J W O'Connell; J A Pacheco-Alvarez; M Scheinman; R S Hattner; F Morady; D B Faulkner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Phase analysis of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography compared with tissue Doppler imaging for the assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Maureen M Henneman; Ji Chen; Claudia Ypenburg; Petra Dibbets; Gabe B Bleeker; Eric Boersma; Marcel P Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Ernest V Garcia; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

1.  SPECT gated blood pool phase analysis of lateral wall motion for prediction of CRT response.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Rob S B Beanlands; Richard Wassenaar; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Clinical, laboratory, and pacing predictors of CRT response.

Authors:  Jagdesh Kandala; Robert K Altman; Mi Young Park; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Microvascular function, is there a link to myocardial viability: Is this another piece to the puzzle?

Authors:  Fernanda Erthal; Natasha Aleksova; Aun Yeong Chong; Robert A de Kemp; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Miriam Shanks; Victoria Delgado; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.