Literature DB >> 16442817

Statistical parametric mapping of brain morphology: sensitivity is dramatically increased by using brain-extracted images as inputs.

George Fein1, Bennett Landman, Hoang Tran, Jerome Barakos, Kirk Moon, Victoria Di Sclafani, Robert Shumway.   

Abstract

A major attraction of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is that it allows researchers to explore large datasets with minimal human intervention. However, the validity and sensitivity of the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM2) approach to VBM are the subject of considerable debate. We visually inspected the SPM2 gray matter segmentations for 101 research participants and found a gross inclusion of non-brain tissue surrounding the entire brain as gray matter in five subjects and focal areas bordering the brain in which non-brain tissue was classified as gray matter in many other subjects. We also found many areas in which the cortical gray matter was incorrectly excluded from the segmentation of the brain. The major source of these errors was the misregistration of individual brain images with the reference T1-weighted brain template. These errors could be eliminated if SPM2 operated on images from which non-brain tissues (scalp, skull, and meninges) are removed (brain-extracted images). We developed a modified SPM2 processing pipeline that used brain-extracted images as inputs to test this hypothesis. We describe the modifications to the SPM2 pipeline that allow analysis of brain-extracted inputs. Using brain-extracted inputs eliminated the non-brain matter inclusions and the cortical gray matter exclusions noted above, reducing the residual mean square errors (RMSEs, the error term of the SPM2 statistical analyses) by over 30%. We show how this reduction in the RMSEs profoundly affects power analyses. SPM2 analyses of brain-extracted images may require sample sizes only half as great as analyses of non-brain-extracted images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442817      PMCID: PMC1987363          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  15 in total

1.  "Voxel-based morphometry" should not be used with imperfectly registered images.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Why voxel-based morphometry should be used.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Regional frontal cortical volumes decrease differentially in aging: an MRI study to compare volumetric approaches and voxel-based morphometry.

Authors:  Danielle J Tisserand; Jens C Pruessner; Ernesto J Sanz Arigita; Martin P J van Boxtel; Alan C Evans; Jelle Jolles; Harry B M Uylings
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Distributional assumptions in voxel-based morphometry.

Authors:  C H Salmond; J Ashburner; F Vargha-Khadem; A Connelly; D G Gadian; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Yongyue Zhang; Mark Jenkinson; Jacqueline Chen; P M Matthews; Antonio Federico; Nicola De Stefano
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Zen and the art of medical image registration: correspondence, homology, and quality.

Authors:  W R Crum; L D Griffin; D L G Hill; D J Hawkes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia.

Authors:  I C Wright; P K McGuire; J B Poline; J M Travere; R M Murray; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Comparison of different methodological implementations of voxel-based morphometry in neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Maria M Shiung; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Automated detection of gray matter malformations using optimized voxel-based morphometry: a systematic approach.

Authors:  M Wilke; J Kassubek; S Ziyeh; A Schulze-Bonhage; H J Huppertz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  21 in total

1.  Persistent dose-dependent changes in brain structure in young adults with low-to-moderate alcohol exposure in utero.

Authors:  Kristen L Eckstrand; Zhaohua Ding; Neil C Dodge; Ronald L Cowan; Joseph L Jacobson; Sandra W Jacobson; Malcolm J Avison
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Brain atrophy in long-term abstinent alcoholics who demonstrate impairment on a simulated gambling task.

Authors:  George Fein; Bennett Landman; Hoang Tran; Shannon McGillivray; Peter Finn; Jerome Barakos; Kirk Moon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Executive performance is related to regional gray matter volume in healthy older individuals.

Authors:  Ruth Ruscheweyh; Michael Deppe; Hubertus Lohmann; Heike Wersching; Catharina Korsukewitz; Thomas Duning; Saskia Bluhm; Christoph Stehling; Simon S Keller; Stefan Knecht
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A Spatial Registration Toolbox for Structural MR Imaging of the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Marco Ganzetti; Quanying Liu; Dante Mantini
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-04

6.  Intrinsic functional connectivity of the central extended amygdala.

Authors:  Rachael M Tillman; Melissa D Stockbridge; Brendon M Nacewicz; Salvatore Torrisi; Andrew S Fox; Jason F Smith; Alexander J Shackman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  The impact of lesion in-painting and registration methods on voxel-based morphometry in detecting regional cerebral gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Ceccarelli; J S Jackson; S Tauhid; A Arora; J Gorky; E Dell'Oglio; A Bakshi; T Chitnis; S J Khoury; H L Weiner; C R G Guttmann; R Bakshi; M Neema
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  A computed tomography-based spatial normalization for the analysis of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the brain.

Authors:  Hanna Cho; Jin Su Kim; Jae Yong Choi; Young Hoon Ryu; Chul Hyoung Lyoo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Abuse of amphetamines and structural abnormalities in the brain.

Authors:  Steven Berman; Joseph O'Neill; Scott Fears; George Bartzokis; Edythe D London
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Functional Connectivity within the Primate Extended Amygdala Is Heritable and Associated with Early-Life Anxious Temperament.

Authors:  Andrew S Fox; Jonathan A Oler; Rasmus M Birn; Alexander J Shackman; Andrew L Alexander; Ned H Kalin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.