Literature DB >> 16441199

The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.

Sergei Gepshtein1, Johannes Burge, Marc O Ernst, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

The nervous system often combines visual and haptic information about object properties such that the combined estimate is more precise than with vision or haptics alone. We examined how the system determines when to combine the signals. Presumably, signals should not be combined when they come from different objects. The likelihood that signals come from different objects is highly correlated with the spatial separation between the signals, so we asked how the spatial separation between visual and haptic signals affects their combination. To do this, we first created conditions for each observer in which the effect of combination--the increase in discrimination precision with two modalities relative to performance with one modality--should be maximal. Then under these conditions, we presented visual and haptic stimuli separated by different spatial distances and compared human performance with predictions of a model that combined signals optimally. We found that discrimination precision was essentially optimal when the signals came from the same location, and that discrimination precision was poorer when the signals came from different locations. Thus, the mechanism of visual-haptic combination is specialized for signals that coincide in space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16441199      PMCID: PMC2632311          DOI: 10.1167/5.11.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance.

Authors:  W S Geisler; J S Perry; B J Super; D P Gallogly
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-08-08       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Marc O Ernst; Knut Drewing; Guillaume Bouyer; Vincent Maury; Abderrahmane Kheddar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  On the lawfulness of grouping by proximity.

Authors:  M Kubovy; A O Holcombe; J Wagemans
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours.

Authors:  James H Elder; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable.

Authors:  K A Stevens
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-03

9.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

Authors:  A Treisman; H Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception.

Authors:  Sergei Gepshtein; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  62 in total

1.  Optimal visual-vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles.

Authors:  John S Butler; Jennifer L Campos; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Time gain influences adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Molly M Mazich; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Multistability, cross-modal binding and the additivity of conjoined grouping principles.

Authors:  Michael Kubovy; Minhong Yu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of walked distances.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; John S Butler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Human spatial orientation in non-stationary environments: relation between self-turning perception and detection of surround motion.

Authors:  Reinhart Jürgens; Wolfgang Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.