Tomoyuki Koga1, Bin Li1, Javier M Figueroa2, Bing Ren1, Clark C Chen2,3, Bob S Carter2,4, Frank B Furnari1. 1. Ludwig Cancer Research, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant III (vIII) is the most common oncogenic rearrangement in glioblastoma (GBM), generated by deletion of exons 2 to 7 of EGFR. The proximal breakpoints occur in variable positions within the 123-kb intron 1, presenting significant challenges in terms of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mapping. Molecular mechanisms underlying these deletions remain unclear. Methods: We determined the presence of EGFRvIII and its breakpoints for 29 GBM samples using quantitative PCR, arrayed PCR mapping, Sanger sequencing, and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Patient-specific breakpoint PCR was performed on tumors, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. The breakpoint sequences and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed to elucidate the underlying biogenic mechanism. Results: PCR mapping and WGS independently unveiled 8 EGFRvIII breakpoints in 6 tumors. Patient-specific primers yielded EGFRvIII PCR amplicons in matched tumors and in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from a CSF sample, but not in cfDNA or extracellular-vesicle DNA from plasma. The breakpoint analysis revealed nucleotide insertions in 4 samples, an insertion of a region outside of the EGFR locus in 1, microhomologies in 3, as well as a duplication or an inversion accompanied by microhomologies in 2, suggestive of distinct DNA repair mechanisms. In the GBM samples that harbored distinct breakpoints, the SNP compositions of EGFRvIII and amplified non-vIII EGFR were identical, suggesting that these rearrangements arose from amplified non-vIII EGFR. Conclusion: Our approach efficiently "fingerprints" each sample's EGFRvIII breakpoints. Breakpoint sequence analyses suggest that independent breakpoints arose from precursor amplified non-vIII EGFR through different DNA repair mechanisms.
Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant III (vIII) is the most common oncogenic rearrangement in glioblastoma (GBM), generated by deletion of exons 2 to 7 of EGFR. The proximal breakpoints occur in variable positions within the 123-kb intron 1, presenting significant challenges in terms of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based mapping. Molecular mechanisms underlying these deletions remain unclear. Methods: We determined the presence of EGFRvIII and its breakpoints for 29 GBM samples using quantitative PCR, arrayed PCR mapping, Sanger sequencing, and whole genome sequencing (WGS). Patient-specific breakpoint PCR was performed on tumors, plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. The breakpoint sequences and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed to elucidate the underlying biogenic mechanism. Results: PCR mapping and WGS independently unveiled 8 EGFRvIII breakpoints in 6 tumors. Patient-specific primers yielded EGFRvIII PCR amplicons in matched tumors and in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from a CSF sample, but not in cfDNA or extracellular-vesicle DNA from plasma. The breakpoint analysis revealed nucleotide insertions in 4 samples, an insertion of a region outside of the EGFR locus in 1, microhomologies in 3, as well as a duplication or an inversion accompanied by microhomologies in 2, suggestive of distinct DNA repair mechanisms. In the GBM samples that harbored distinct breakpoints, the SNP compositions of EGFRvIII and amplified non-vIII EGFR were identical, suggesting that these rearrangements arose from amplified non-vIII EGFR. Conclusion: Our approach efficiently "fingerprints" each sample's EGFRvIII breakpoints. Breakpoint sequence analyses suggest that independent breakpoints arose from precursor amplified non-vIII EGFR through different DNA repair mechanisms.
Authors: Nicolas Vogt; Sandrine-Hélène Lefèvre; Françoise Apiou; Anne-Marie Dutrillaux; Andrej Cör; Pascal Leuraud; Marie-France Poupon; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse; Bernard Malfoy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johan M Kros; Dana M Mustafa; Lennard J M Dekker; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Theo M Luider; Ping-Pin Zheng Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Joshua M Francis; Cheng-Zhong Zhang; Cecile L Maire; Joonil Jung; Veronica E Manzo; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Heather Homer; Sam Haidar; Brendan Blumenstiel; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Azra H Ligon; J Christopher Love; Matthew Meyerson; Keith L Ligon Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Feng Zhang; Mehrdad Khajavi; Anne M Connolly; Charles F Towne; Sat Dev Batish; James R Lupski Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Javier M Figueroa; Johan Skog; Johnny Akers; Hongying Li; Ricardo Komotar; Randy Jensen; Florian Ringel; Isaac Yang; Steven Kalkanis; Reid Thompson; Lori LoGuidice; Emily Berghoff; Andrew Parsa; Linda Liau; William Curry; Daniel Cahill; Chetan Bettegowda; Frederick F Lang; E Antonio Chiocca; John Henson; Ryan Kim; Xandra Breakefield; Clark Chen; Karen Messer; Fred Hochberg; Bob S Carter Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Rick Kamps; Rita D Brandão; Bianca J van den Bosch; Aimee D C Paulussen; Sofia Xanthoulea; Marinus J Blok; Andrea Romano Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Ciro Zanca; Genaro R Villa; Jorge A Benitez; Amy Haseley Thorne; Tomoyuki Koga; Matteo D'Antonio; Shiro Ikegami; Jianhui Ma; Antonia D Boyer; Afsheen Banisadr; Nathan M Jameson; Alison D Parisian; Olesja V Eliseeva; Gabriela F Barnabe; Feng Liu; Sihan Wu; Huijun Yang; Jill Wykosky; Kelly A Frazer; Vladislav V Verkhusha; Maria G Isaguliants; William A Weiss; Timothy C Gahman; Andrew K Shiau; Clark C Chen; Paul S Mischel; Webster K Cavenee; Frank B Furnari Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Tom M Thomas; Ken Miyaguchi; Lincoln A Edwards; Hongqiang Wang; Hassen Wollebo; Li Aiguo; Ramachandran Murali; Yizhou Wang; Daniel Braas; Justin S Michael; Allen M Andres; Miqin Zhang; Kamel Khalili; Roberta A Gottlieb; J Manuel Perez; John S Yu Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Deeksha Saxena; Saad Sheikh; Gary Kao; Zev A Binder; Michelle Alonso-Basanta; Donald M O'Rourke; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jay F Dorsey Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2019-11-28
Authors: Krishanthan Vigneswaran; Nathaniel H Boyd; Se-Yeong Oh; Shoeb Lallani; Andrew Boucher; Stewart G Neill; Jeffrey J Olson; Renee D Read Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 12.531