Literature DB >> 12161758

A PCR-based amplification method retaining the quantitative difference between two complex genomes.

G Mike Makrigiorgos1, Subrata Chakrabarti, Yuzhi Zhang, Manjit Kaur, Brendan D Price.   

Abstract

With the increasing emergence of genome-wide analysis technologies (including comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), expression profiling on microarrays, differential display (DD), subtractive hybridization, and representational difference analysis (RDA)), there is frequently a need to amplify entire genomes or cDNAs by PCR to obtain enough material for comparisons among target and control samples. A major problem with PCR is that amplification occurs in a nonlinear manner and reproducibility is influenced by stray impurities. As a result, when two complex DNA populations are amplified separately, the quantitative relationship between two genes after amplification is generally not the same as their relation before amplification. Here we describe balanced PCR, a procedure that faithfully retains the difference among corresponding amplified genes by using a simple principle. Two distinct genomic DNA samples are tagged with oligonucleotides containing both a common and a unique DNA sequence. The genomic DNA samples are pooled and amplified in a single PCR tube using the common DNA tag. By mixing the two genomes, PCR loses the ability to discriminate among the different alleles and the influence of impurities is eliminated. The PCR-amplified pooled samples can be separated using the DNA tag unique to each individual genomic DNA sample. The principle of this method has been validated with synthetic DNA, genomic DNA, and cDNA applied on microarrays. By removing the bias of PCR, this method allows a balanced amplification of allelic fragments from two complex DNAs even after three sequential rounds of PCR. This balanced PCR approach should allow genetic analysis in minute laser-microdissected tissues, paraffin-embedded archived material, or single cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161758     DOI: 10.1038/nbt724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  20 in total

1.  Small amplified RNA-SAGE: an alternative approach to study transcriptome from limiting amount of mRNA.

Authors:  Catheline Vilain; Frederick Libert; David Venet; Sabine Costagliola; Gilbert Vassart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Global amplification of mRNA by template-switching PCR: linearity and application to microarray analysis.

Authors:  L Petalidis; S Bhattacharyya; G A Morris; V P Collins; T C Freeman; P A Lyons
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Metagenomic profiling: microarray analysis of an environmental genomic library.

Authors:  Jonathan L Sebat; Frederick S Colwell; Ronald L Crawford
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Cameron Brennan; Martha Rook; Jia Liu Wolfe; Christopher Leo; Lynda Chin; Hongjie Pan; Wei-Hua Liu; Brendan Price; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Quantification of multiple gene expression in individual cells.

Authors:  António Peixoto; Marta Monteiro; Benedita Rocha; Henrique Veiga-Fernandes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  DNA amplification method tolerant to sample degradation.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Elizabeth Maher; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Christopher Leo; Manjit Kaur; Penny Zhu; Martha Rook; Jia Liu Wolfe; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Whole transcriptome amplification for gene expression profiling and development of molecular archives.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Rohit Mehra; Daniel R Rhodes; Rajal B Shah; Mark A Rubin; Eric Bruening; Vladimir Makarov; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  Microarray-based comparison of three amplification methods for nanogram amounts of total RNA.

Authors:  Ruchira Singh; Rajanikanth J Maganti; Sairam V Jabba; Martin Wang; Glenn Deng; Joe Don Heath; Nurith Kurn; Philine Wangemann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.249

9.  Whole genome amplification of plasma-circulating DNA enables expanded screening for allelic imbalance in plasma.

Authors:  Jin Li; Lyndsay Harris; Harvey Mamon; Matthew H Kulke; Wei-Hua Liu; Penny Zhu; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Expanding the Dynamic Range of Fluorescence Assays through Single-Molecule Counting and Intensity Calibration.

Authors:  Lucas Smith; Manish Kohli; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 15.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.