Literature DB >> 16435001

Identification of probable genotyping errors by consideration of haplotypes.

Tim Becker1, Ruta Valentonyte, Peter J P Croucher, Konstantin Strauch, Stefan Schreiber, Jochen Hampe, Michael Knapp.   

Abstract

Undetected genotyping errors pose a problem in genetic epidemiological studies, as they may invalidate statistical analysis or reduce its power. Haplotype analysis requires an improved standard of the data, because a haplotype can be inferred correctly only if the genotypes of all its markers are correct. Here, we present a method that identifies probable genotyping errors in trio samples with the help of the estimated haplotype frequency distribution of the sample. If the likelihood of the most likely haplotype explanation depends strongly on just one genotype, in the sense that setting the genotype to be missing leads to a much more likely haplotype explanation, this genotype is considered as a potential genotyping error. We describe a method that systematically searches the whole data set for such potential errors. Based on the haplotype distribution of a real data set, we carry out a simulation study to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the method. In addition, we apply our approach to the real data set itself. Potentially erroneous genotypes are re-determined via sequencing. The results of both the simulation study and of the application to the real data set show that a considerable proportion of true genotyping errors is detected and that the number of false-positive signals is acceptable. We conclude that it is indeed possible to identify probable genotyping errors by considering haplotypes. The method described here will be part of the next release of our FAMHAP software.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16435001     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  7 in total

1.  Distinct error rates for reference and nonreference genotypes estimated by pedigree analysis.

Authors:  Richard J Wang; Predrag Radivojac; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.

Authors:  Charles Y K Cheung; Elizabeth A Thompson; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.

Authors:  Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Helmut Küchenhoff; Guido Fischer; Norman Klopp; Melanie Kolz; Harald Grallert; Caren Vollmert; Stefanie Wagner; Cornelia Huth; Julia Müller; Martina Müller; Steven C Hunt; Annette Peters; Bernhard Paulweber; H-Erich Wichmann; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Illig
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  A simple and fast two-locus quality control test to detect false positives due to batch effects in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Sang Hong Lee; Dale R Nyholt; Stuart Macgregor; Anjali K Henders; Krina T Zondervan; Grant W Montgomery; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods.

Authors:  Vivien Marquard; Lars Beckmann; Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Jenny Chang-Claude
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

Authors:  N Khalilisamani; P C Thomson; H W Raadsma; M S Khatkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.