BACKGROUND: Although Medicare claims data have been increasingly used to examine the patterns and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy, their external validity has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate Medicare claims for chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We completed medical chart reviews for 1228 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age 65 and older between 1993 and 1999 in New Mexico that were linked with Medicare claims data, achieving an estimated sensitivity of more than 90% and a 0.05 level of precision. RESULTS: Of the 150 subjects identified by Medicare claims as receiving chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, 75% were confirmed by medical records as having received chemotherapy. Of the remaining 25% of cases without chart verification, (1) 33 cases had 7 or more claims for chemotherapy and also had specific chemotherapy drugs indicated in Medicare data, representing 22% (33/150) of all cases that received chemotherapy according to Medicare claims and (2) 4 cases had 1 to 6 claims for chemotherapy, representing 3% (4/150) of all cases with claims for chemotherapy. Of those 1078 subjects who did not receive chemotherapy according to Medicare claims, more than 99% were confirmed by chart reviews. Observed agreement on chemotherapy between Medicare claims and chart reviews was 94% and overall reliability (kappa) was 0.69 (95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Of cases identified as receiving chemotherapy by Medicare claims, 97% had strong evidence and only 3% had weak evidence for receiving this therapy.
BACKGROUND: Although Medicare claims data have been increasingly used to examine the patterns and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy, their external validity has not been well studied. OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate Medicare claims for chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We completed medical chart reviews for 1228 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age 65 and older between 1993 and 1999 in New Mexico that were linked with Medicare claims data, achieving an estimated sensitivity of more than 90% and a 0.05 level of precision. RESULTS: Of the 150 subjects identified by Medicare claims as receiving chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, 75% were confirmed by medical records as having received chemotherapy. Of the remaining 25% of cases without chart verification, (1) 33 cases had 7 or more claims for chemotherapy and also had specific chemotherapy drugs indicated in Medicare data, representing 22% (33/150) of all cases that received chemotherapy according to Medicare claims and (2) 4 cases had 1 to 6 claims for chemotherapy, representing 3% (4/150) of all cases with claims for chemotherapy. Of those 1078 subjects who did not receive chemotherapy according to Medicare claims, more than 99% were confirmed by chart reviews. Observed agreement on chemotherapy between Medicare claims and chart reviews was 94% and overall reliability (kappa) was 0.69 (95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Of cases identified as receiving chemotherapy by Medicare claims, 97% had strong evidence and only 3% had weak evidence for receiving this therapy.
Authors: D K McClish; L Penberthy; M Whittemore; C Newschaffer; D Woolard; C E Desch; S Retchin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1997-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: B E Hillner; M K McDonald; L Penberthy; C E Desch; T J Smith; P Maddux; W P Glasheen; S M Retchin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J B Mitchell; T Bubolz; J E Paul; C L Pashos; J J Escarce; L H Muhlbaier; J M Wiesman; W W Young; R S Epstein; J C Javitt Journal: Med Care Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: J L Warren; G F Riley; A L Potosky; C N Klabunde; E Richter; R Ballard-Barbash Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1998-06-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki Carroll; Thomas Delate; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rossetti; Paul A Fishman; Elizabeth T Loggers; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; George L Delclos; Kim Waller; Dong Zhang Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sharon Giordano; Jane M Geraci; George L Delclos; Keith Burau; Shenying Fang Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Steven T Fleming; Ann S Hamilton; Susan A Sabatino; Gretchen G Kimmick; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Jean B Owen; Bin Huang; Wenke Hwang Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth B Lamont; James E Herndon; Jane C Weeks; I Craig Henderson; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Richard L Schilsky; Nicholas A Christakis Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bruce E Hillner; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Yunjie Song; Tracy Onega; Lucy G Hanna; Barry A Siegel Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Gary V Walker; Sharon H Giordano; Melanie Williams; Jing Jiang; Jiangong Niu; Jill MacKinnon; Patricia Anderson; Brad Wohler; Amber H Sinclair; Francis P Boscoe; Maria J Schymura; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038