Literature DB >> 8637025

Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women.

R Ballard-Barbash1, A L Potosky, L C Harlan, S G Nayfield, L G Kessler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In addition to demographic and health care-related characteristics, the age and physiologic status of women at the time of breast cancer diagnosis have been reported to influence receipt of standard treatments. Previous studies of the influence of age and comorbidity have not examined whether other patient-, region-, or health care-related characteristics altered the association of age and comorbidity with type of treatment received.
PURPOSE: This study examined factors associated with receipt of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy, both of which are recommended treatments for breast cancer, among a cohort of 18,704 women aged 65 years or more who had breast cancer diagnosed during the period from 1985 through 1989.
METHODS: A data file linking Medicare claims records to data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute was utilized. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between patient, region, and hospital characteristics and the receipt of specific treatments. The likelihood test was used to assess the significance of observed associations (expressed as odds ratios [ORs]). Because of multiple comparisons, only those ORs with two-sided P values <.01 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The frequency of breast-conserving surgery was highest (54%) among women aged 80 years or more, who had two or more comorbid conditions and stage I disease. However, in general, the receipt of radiation therapy among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery declined markedly with age, irrespective of comorbidity status and disease stage. Between the ages of 65-69 years and 80 years or older, radiation therapy declined from 77% to 24% among women with no comorbid conditions and from 50% to 12% among women with two or more comorbid conditions. In regression models that included hospital, region, and patient characteristics as variables, age and comorbidity remained independently associated with the receipt of radiation therapy (OR = 0.12 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10-0.14 for women aged 80 years or more compared with women 65-69 years of age and OR of 0.33 [95% CI = 0.24-0.46] for women with two or more comorbid conditions versus no comorbid conditions).
CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for multiple clinical and nonclinical factors influencing treatment, chronologic age remains an important independent factor associated with the receipt of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery among women aged 65 years or more who were diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS: Future studies should determine whether these differences in treatment patterns among older women result in increased morbidity (e.g., from recurrence), shortened disease-free or overall survival, or decreased quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637025     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.11.716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  68 in total

1.  Disparities in breast cancer characteristics and outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Siew Loon Ooi; Maria Elena Martinez; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Effect of creatinine clearance on patterns of toxicity in older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Anju Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Ann Jakubowski; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; Jane M Geraci; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Predictors and outcomes of completion axillary node dissection among older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sara H Javid; Hao He; Larissa A Korde; David R Flum; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Role of age and health in treatment recommendations for older adults with breast cancer: the perspective of oncologists and primary care providers.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; F Lennie Wong; Doojduen Villaluna; Smita Bhatia; Cathie T Chung; Joanne Mortimer; Sara Hurvitz; Arash Naeim
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Change in cycle 1 to cycle 2 haematological counts predicts toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Ann Jakubowski; Marjorie Zauderer; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Ya-Chen T Shih; Ying Xu; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Wendy A Woodward; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Treatment patterns, outcomes and costs among elderly patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Menzin; Kathleen Lang; Craig C Earle; Alastair Glendenning
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation after conservative surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Thomas B Julian; Eric A Strom; H Kim Lyerly; Armando E Giuliano; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Frank A Vicini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Incremental value of using Medicaid claim files to study comorbid conditions and treatments in dually eligible beneficiaries.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Bassam Dahman; Paul M Bataki; Siran Koroukian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.