Literature DB >> 8411231

Cancer treatment and age: patient perspectives.

P A Newcomb1, P P Carbone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite some evidence that age does not meaningfully influence the efficacy or toxicity of cancer treatment, older patients tend to receive less comprehensive cancer therapies.
PURPOSE: We conducted a population-based study to evaluate the selection of cancer treatment among the elderly.
METHODS: Between September 1 and November 30, 1990, we interviewed by telephone a sample of 628 female Wisconsin residents recently diagnosed with breast (507) or colorectal (121) cancer. The women, aged 20-74 at the time of diagnosis, were identified through Wisconsin's statewide tumor registry. The approximately 30-minute long telephone interview, part of a larger study of cancer etiology, included questions on treatment history, physician specialty, and reasons for the selection of specific therapies. Analyses compared the proportion of subjects with various treatment characteristics according to age (< 65 and > or = 65 years). In evaluating the effect of age on selected therapies, we adjusted summary proportions for stage of disease using the indirect method. The Mantel-Haenszel chi square statistic was used to evaluate statistical significance of the differences in proportions.
RESULTS: After adjusting for stage of disease at diagnosis, substantial variation was observed in cancer treatment according to age for both breast and colorectal cancer. Older women (> or = 65 years) with breast cancer were less likely than younger women (< 65 years) to have received conservative surgery, radiation, and adjuvant therapy. Older women were, in fact, more likely than younger women to accept mastectomy (P = .03). Consultation with a medical or radiation oncologist was less common among older than younger patients (57% versus 73%). Older women were also less likely to have alternative therapies presented to them (19% versus 31%). While older patients were less likely to have been offered adjuvant treatments, like chemotherapy (P < .01), they were also more likely than younger women to reject these treatments when offered (P = .01). These differences were observed in both breast and colorectal cancer patients. Regardless of age, the most common reasons for not selecting treatments were physicians' recommendations and the desire for more comprehensive treatment. Concern about side effects, however, was more frequently reported by older women (P = .07). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION: Patients' ages influence the choice of treatment. Physicians offer older women with cancer different treatments from those offered to younger women and are less likely to recommend specialist consultation. Physicians' advice and description of toxicity may influence patients' selection of treatment. However, older patients' concerns about the consequences of cancer treatment may also influence treatment choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8411231     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.19.1580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  40 in total

1.  Cancer in the elderly: are we ready?

Authors:  D Khayat; G Auclerc
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Cancer in old age--is it inadequately investigated and treated?

Authors:  N J Turner; R A Haward; G P Mulley; P J Selby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

Review 3.  Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women.

Authors:  R E van Rijswijk; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Senior adult oncology.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Ilene S Browner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Crystal S Denlinger; Mollie deShazo; Martine Extermann; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Jimmie C Holland; Holly M Holmes; Mohana B Karlekar; Nancy L Keating; June McKoy; Bruno C Medeiros; Ewa Mrozek; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen H Petersdorf; Hope S Rugo; Rebecca A Silliman; William P Tew; Louise C Walter; Alva B Weir; Tanya Wildes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Effect of creatinine clearance on patterns of toxicity in older patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Anju Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Ann Jakubowski; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Charles R Key; Lois Dickie; Ronald Darling; Jane M Geraci; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav Talwar; Ryan Daniel; Tyler McKechnie; Oren Levine; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A retrospective study of the impact of age on patterns of care for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kenji Hashimoto; Kan Yonemori; Chikako Shimizu; Akihiro Hirakawa; Harukaze Yamamoto; Makiko Ono; Taizo Hirata; Tsutomu Kouno; Kenji Tamura; Noriyuki Katsumata; Masashi Ando; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Role of age and health in treatment recommendations for older adults with breast cancer: the perspective of oncologists and primary care providers.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; F Lennie Wong; Doojduen Villaluna; Smita Bhatia; Cathie T Chung; Joanne Mortimer; Sara Hurvitz; Arash Naeim
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Change in cycle 1 to cycle 2 haematological counts predicts toxicity in older patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Kelly Brogan; Katherine S Panageas; Ann Jakubowski; Marjorie Zauderer; Carol Pearce; Larry Norton; Jane Howard; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.