Literature DB >> 20573644

Agreement between structured checklists and Medicaid claims for preventive dental visits in primary care medical offices.

Bhavna T Pahel1, R Gary Rozier, Sally C Stearns.   

Abstract

For program evaluation purposes, the feasibility of matching Medicaid claims with physician-completed structured checklists (encounter forms, EFs) was assessed in a pediatric office-based preventive dental program. We examined agreement on visits (weighted kappa) and predictors of a match between EFs and claims (multinomial logit model with practice-level clustering). In total, 34,171 matches occurred between 41,252 EFs and 40,909 claims, representing 82.8 per cent of EFs and 83.5 per cent of claims. Agreement on visits was 56 per cent (weighted kappa = 0.66). Pediatric practices provided the majority of visits (82.4%) and matches. Increasing age of child and residence in same county as the medical practice increased the likelihood of a match. Structured checklists can be combined with claims to better assess provision of preventive dental services in pediatric primary care. However, future research should examine strategies to improve the completion of structured checklists by primary care providers if data beyond claims are to be used for program evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20573644      PMCID: PMC5101046          DOI: 10.1177/1460458210364036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  22 in total

1.  Combining state administrative databases and provider records to assess the quality of care for children enrolled in Medicaid.

Authors:  J J Cotter; W R Smith; L F Rossiter; C B Pugh; J D Bramble
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Practical introduction to record linkage for injury research.

Authors:  D E Clark
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.

Authors:  Olaf H Klungel; Edwin P Martens; Bruce M Psaty; Diederik E Grobbee; Sean D Sullivan; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Hubert G M Leufkens; A de Boer
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  The use of administrative databases to assess oral health care.

Authors:  James L Leake; Renata I Werneck
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  The utility of administrative data for measuring adherence to cancer surveillance care guidelines.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Lonni Schultz; Janine Simpkins; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Record linkage strategies, outpatient procedures, and administrative data.

Authors:  L L Roos; R Walld; A Wajda; R Bond; K Hartford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Agreement between administrative claims and the medical record in identifying patients with a diagnosis of hypertension.

Authors:  Michael F Bullano; Siddhesh Kamat; Vincent J Willey; Suna Barlas; Douglas J Watson; Susan K Brenneman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; R A G Winkens; L Shirran; C Cunningham; A Mayhew; R Thomas; C Fraser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

10.  Oral health risk assessment timing and establishment of the dental home.

Authors:  Kevin J Hale
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy of record linkage software in merging dental administrative data sets.

Authors:  Heather Beil; John S Preisser; R Gary Rozier
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 1.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.