Literature DB >> 8043269

The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect.

A Chatterjee1, M Mennemeier, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

The relationship between objective measures and subjective experiences of sensory stimuli is described by a power law, psi = K phi beta, in which psi represents the psychological value and phi the physical value. The constant (K) and the exponent (beta) are empirically derived. This relationship is often assumed to correspond to properties of peripheral receptor sensory transduction. Patients with left-sided spatial neglect tend to bisect lines to the right of the objective midline. Line bisection bias was used as the dependent variable in how a patient with neglect and five normal subjects bisected lines of varying lengths. Analyzing these data as a power function accounted for over 99% of the variance in five different experimental conditions. The normal exponent matched the value expected from traditional psychophysical experiments of line length estimation, whereas the patient's exponent was diminished. The patient's data provide evidence for central nervous system participation in computations underlying psychophysical relationships. The notion that attentional and perceptual processes are closely linked was supported by the influence of attentional cuing on the power functions obtained in normal subjects. The descriptive precision of the power function uncovered qualitative variability in how normal subjects allocate attention across different spatial reference frames and demonstrated that this patient had a quantitative defect in directing attention across an allosteric reference frame, but a qualitative defect in directing attention across a viewer/environment reference frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8043269     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  7 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Bias in magnitude estimation following left hemisphere injury.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Mark Mennemeier; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Jay Meythaler; Victor W Mark; George R Jewel; Heather Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Crossover by line length and spatial location.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; C Pierce; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  A search for the optimal stimulus.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; M Dillon; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Picturing unilateral spatial neglect: viewer versus object centred reference frames.

Authors:  A Chatterjee
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Stimulation Induced Changes in Ratio Scaling Between and Within Hemispheres.

Authors:  Tracy Kretzmer; Mark Mennemeier
Journal:  Adv Neurol Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-01-07

7.  Can Crossover and Altered Magnitude Estimation in Neglect Be Explained by Contextual Effects?

Authors:  George R Jewell; Jill Salem; Shannon Hartley; Elsie Vezey; Victor W Mark; Mark S Mennemeier
Journal:  Adv Neurol Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-05-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.