Literature DB >> 16427688

Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.

Nandita M deSouza1, Roberto Dina, G Angus McIndoe, W Patrick Soutter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Estimation of tumor volume by endovaginal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a better indicator of prognosis than FIGO stage in women with cervical cancer treated by standard modalities. However, the introduction of fertility conserving surgical techniques makes fresh demands upon imaging of these small tumors.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of endovaginal MRI in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension in uterine cervical cancer by comparing the findings with those at radical hysterectomy in order to establish its role in guiding the surgical decision-making process preoperatively.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 119 patients who underwent endovaginal and external phased array MR imaging at 0.5 T or 1.5 T before radical hysterectomy. Tumor presence within the cervix and parametrial extension was noted on the endovaginal images. Histopathological findings were correlated with MR imaging results for all patients.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for detecting tumor by endovaginal MR imaging in the 119 patients were 96.9 and 59.0%, respectively. Thirty-six percent of tumors were <or=1 cm(3) in volume. For these, sensitivity and specificity for tumor detection were 87% and 65% respectively. For evaluation of parametrial status, sensitivity was 80%, and specificity was 91.3%. A cut-off MRI tumor volume of 5.2 cm(3) predicted histologically confirmed lymph node metastases with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 72.5%.
CONCLUSION: Endovaginal magnetic resonance imaging has high sensitivity in the preoperative staging of uterine cervical cancer even for tumors <or=1 cm(3). It is an invaluable technique in planning fertility-conserving or radical surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16427688     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  13 in total

1.  Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; E Sala; T Da Cunha; A Bergman; B Brkljacic; F Danza; R Forstner; B Hamm; R Kubik-Huch; C Lopez; R Manfredi; J McHugo; L Oleaga; K Togashi; K Kinkel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

Review 3.  Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charis Bourgioti; Konstantinos Chatoupis; Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 4.  [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  F Collettini; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Comparison of T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T for assessing the local extent of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Hiroshi Shinmoto; Shigenori Hayashi; Hirotaka Akita; Takuma Fujii; Shuji Mikami; Akihiro Tanimoto; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the pretreatment staging of cervical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maarten G Thomeer; Cees Gerestein; Sandra Spronk; Helena C van Doorn; Els van der Ham; Myriam G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Metastatic gynecologic malignancies: advances in treatment and management.

Authors:  John K Chan; Stephanie Chow; Subasish Bhowmik; Amandeep Mann; Daniel S Kapp; Robert L Coleman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Peter Petrow; Kari Tanderup; Primoz Petric; Daniel Berger; Christian Kirisits; Erik M Pedersen; Erik van Limbergen; Christine Haie-Meder; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Fertility-sparing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adelaide Fernanda Ribeiro Cubal; Joana Isabel Ferreira Carvalho; Maria Fernanda Martins Costa; Ana Paula Tavares Branco
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-08

10.  Influencing surgical management in patients with carcinoma of the cervix using a T2- and ZOOM-diffusion-weighted endovaginal MRI technique.

Authors:  K Downey; M Jafar; A D Attygalle; S Hazell; V A Morgan; S L Giles; M A Schmidt; T E J Ind; J H Shepherd; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.