Literature DB >> 27158421

Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.

Charis Bourgioti1, Konstantinos Chatoupis1, Lia Angela Moulopoulos1.   

Abstract

Uterine cervical cancer still remains an important socioeconomic issue because it largely affects women of reproductive age. Prognosis is highly depended on extent of the disease at diagnosis and, therefore, accurate staging is crucial for optimal management. Cervical cancer is clinically staged, according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics guidelines, but, currently, there is increased use of cross sectional imaging modalities [computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT)] for the study of important prognostic factors like tumor size, parametrial invasion, endocervical extension, pelvic side wall or adjacent/distal organs involvement and lymph node status. Imaging indications also include cervical cancer follow-up, evaluation of tumor response to treatment and selection of suitable candidates for less radical surgeries like radical trachelectomy for fertility preservation. The preferred imaging method for local cervical cancer evaluation is MRI; CT is equally effective for evaluation of extrauterine spread of the disease. PET-CT shows high diagnostic performance for the detection of tumor relapse and metastatic lymph nodes. The aim of this review is to familiarize radiologists with the MRI appearance of cervical carcinoma and to discuss the indications of cross sectional imaging during the course of the disease in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Tumor staging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27158421      PMCID: PMC4840192          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  60 in total

1.  Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.

Authors:  C M Ho; T Y Chien; C M Jeng; Y M Tsang; B Y Shih; S C Chang
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Parametrial invasion in carcinoma of cervix: role of MRI measured tumour volume.

Authors:  A Jena; R Oberoi; S Rawal; S K Das; K K Pandey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix.

Authors:  Evis Sala; Suzanne Wakely; Emma Senior; David Lomas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings.

Authors:  H Hricak; C G Lacey; L G Sandles; Y C Chang; M L Winkler; J L Stern
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Role of MR imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience.

Authors:  P D Peppercorn; A R Jeyarajah; R Woolas; J H Shepherd; D H Oram; I J Jacobs; P Armstrong; D Lowe; R H Reznek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  W Glenn McCluggage; V Palaniappan Sumathi; Hilary A McBride; Anna Patterson
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Early-stage cervical carcinoma: the role of multidetector CT in correlation with histopathological findings.

Authors:  A C Tsili; V Tsangou; G Koliopoulos; T Stefos; M I Argyropoulou
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 9.  Pearls and pitfalls in MRI of gynecologic malignancy with diffusion-weighted technique.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Helen Addley; Himanshu Pandey; Evis Sala; Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis.

Authors:  H Hricak; C B Powell; K K Yu; E Washington; L L Subak; J L Stern; M G Cisternas; R L Arenson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The role of para-aortic nodal irradiation in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adela Poitevin Chacón; Jessica Chavez-Nogueda; Rubí Ramos-Prudencio; Michelle Aline Villavicencio-Queijeiro; Francisco Lozano-Ruiz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 2.  Systematic radiological approach to utero-ovarian pathologies.

Authors:  Olivera Nikolic; Marijana Basta Nikolic; Aleksandar Spasic; Mila Milagros Otero-Garcia; Sanja Stojanovic
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Authors:  Weiliang Qian; Qian Chen; Zhongshuai Zhang; Hong Wang; Jibin Zhang; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Adjuvant hysterectomy after radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Peter Hass; Holm Eggemann; Serban Dan Costa; Atanas Ignatov
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Early Cervical Cancer: Current Dilemmas of Staging and Surgery.

Authors:  Tiffany Zigras; Genevieve Lennox; Karla Willows; Allan Covens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Automatic PET cervical tumor segmentation by combining deep learning and anatomic prior.

Authors:  Liyuan Chen; Chenyang Shen; Zhiguo Zhou; Genevieve Maquilan; Kevin Albuquerque; Michael R Folkert; Jing Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Mansur A Ghani; Joy Liau; Ramez Eskander; Loren Mell; Tahir Yusufaly; Sebastian Obrzut
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.081

8.  Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Derived Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers and Correlation with Clinicopathological Features in Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Ramireddy Jeba Karunya; Putta Tharani; Subhashini John; Ramani Manoj Kumar; Saikat Das
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  HPV Status and Individual Characteristics of Human Papillomavirus Infection as Predictors for Clinical Outcome of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Liana Mkrtchian; Irina Zamulaeva; Liudmila Krikunova; Valentina Kiseleva; Olga Matchuk; Liubov Liubina; Gunel Kulieva; Sergey Ivanov; Andrey Kaprin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-magnetic resonance hybrid imaging: An emerging tool for staging of cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Alina Nazir; Robert Matthews; Annapurneswara Rao Chimpiri; Melissa Henretta; Joyce Varughese; Dinko Franceschi
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.