Literature DB >> 12851550

Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants.

Robert S Hong1, Jay T Rubinstein, Dan Wehner, David Horn.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: The addition of a continuous, unmodulated, high-rate pulse train to sinusoidal stimuli presented by the cochlear implant to implant recipients will result in increases in the psychophysical dynamic range.
BACKGROUND: The hearing dynamic range of cochlear implant patients is markedly reduced compared with that of normal-hearing individuals. This has negative implications for both speech perception and sound quality in these patients. It has been suggested that the addition of an unmodulated high-rate pulse train to deafened auditory nerves could create spontaneous-like neural activity, similar to that recorded from normal ears, of which one significant benefit would be an increase in the dynamic range of cochlear implant users.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who underwent implantation with the Clarion CII device participated in this single-blinded prospective study. The psychophysical dynamic range of 28 of these subjects was measured with sinusoidal stimuli in response to various levels of an additional unmodulated high-rate pulse train.
RESULTS: All the tested subjects (n = 28) demonstrated an increase in dynamic range in response to an appropriate level of unmodulated high-rate pulse train. The largest increase in dynamic range for each subject had a mean value of 6.7 dB.
CONCLUSION: The addition of an unmodulated high-rate pulse train to the electric signal presented to cochlear implant patients results in significant increases in dynamic range for sinusoidal stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851550     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200307000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

4.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

5.  Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Joseph Heng; Gabriela Cantarero; Mounya Elhilali; Charles J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

7.  Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Tiffany Elise H Chua; Mark Bachman; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Jae-Ik Lee; Richard Seist; Stephen McInturff; Daniel J Lee; M Christian Brown; Konstantina M Stankovic; Shelley Fried
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

10.  Effect of ECAP-based choice of stimulation rate on speech-perception performance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bournique; Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.