Literature DB >> 16424973

Usefulness of teicoplanin for preventing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in orthopedic surgery.

A Soriano1, D Popescu, S García, G Bori, J A Martínez, V Balasso, F Marco, M Almela, J Mensa.   

Abstract

In order to gather more data on the use of teicoplanin for reducing MRSA infections in high-risk populations, the present study was conducted. At a hospital in Barcelona, Spain, there was a high prevalence of MRSA infections among patients who underwent surgery for femoral neck fracture during the first 5 months of 2002 (period A) when cefuroxime was the antibiotic prophylaxis. During the following 12 months (period B) 600 mg of teicoplanin was added to cefuroxime. The rates of overall and MRSA infection during period A were 5.07 and 2.73%, respectively. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated there was no clonal relationship among MRSA strains. No nasal carriers of MRSA were detected among health workers. During period B the rates of overall and MRSA infection were 2.36 and 0.19%, respectively. Both rates were statistically significantly lower than those in period A (p<0.05). These results suggest teicoplanin may be useful in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery when the prevalence of MRSA is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16424973     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-005-0073-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  17 in total

1.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Part II. Recommendations for isolation precautions in hospitals. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: a prospective comparison of two dosage regimens of teicoplanin with a combination of flucloxacillin and tobramycin.

Authors:  A P Wilson; T Treasure; R N Grüneberg; M F Sturridge; D N Ross
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Authors:  A J Mangram; T C Horan; M L Pearson; L C Silver; W R Jarvis
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 5.  Comparative safety of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T L Bannerman; G A Hancock; F C Tenover; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  The evolving epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital.

Authors:  M C Layton; W J Hierholzer; J E Patterson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia diagnosed at hospital admission: distinguishing between community-acquired versus healthcare-associated strains.

Authors:  E Tacconelli; L Venkataraman; P C De Girolami; E M C DAgata
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Strategy to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus post-operative infection in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  J C De Lucas-Villarrubia; M Lopez-Franco; J J Granizo; J C De Lucas-Garcia; E Gomez-Barrena
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparative effect of protein binding on the killing activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin.

Authors:  E M Bailey; M J Rybak; G W Kaatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  10 in total

1.  The hip fracture best practice tariff: early surgery and the implications for MRSA screening and antibiotic prophylaxis.

Authors:  David J Bryson; Abhinav Gulihar; Randeep S Aujla; Grahame J S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-12

2.  Prophylaxis with teicoplanin and cefuroxime reduces the rate of prosthetic joint infection after primary arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduard Tornero; Sebastian García-Ramiro; Juan C Martínez-Pastor; Guillem Bori; Jordi Bosch; Laura Morata; Marta Sala; Misericordia Basora; Josep Mensa; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Magnetic microsphere-based methods to study the interaction of teicoplanin with peptides and bacteria.

Authors:  Menake E Piyasena; Lilian J Real; Rochelle A Diamond; H Howard Xu; Frank A Gomez
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 4.  Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Bart A Swierstra; Anton M J S Vervest; Geert H I M Walenkamp; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter T J Spierings; Ide C Heyligers; Job L C van Susante; Harmen B Ettema; Mariette J Jansen; Pim J Hennis; Janneke de Vries; Sabrina B Muller-Ploeger; Margreet A Pols
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Prosthetic joint infection-a devastating complication of hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture.

Authors:  Ellen Guren; Wender Figved; Frede Frihagen; Leiv Otto Watne; Marianne Westberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Incidence and risk of surgical site infection after adult femoral neck fractures treated by surgery: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Chenni Ji; Yanbin Zhu; Song Liu; Jia Li; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Obese patients have higher rates of polymicrobial and Gram-negative early periprosthetic joint infections of the hip than non-obese patients.

Authors:  Claudia A M Löwik; Wierd P Zijlstra; Bas A S Knobben; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Baukje Dijkstra; Astrid J de Vries; Greetje A Kampinga; Glen Mithoe; Aziz Al Moujahid; Paul C Jutte; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Effectiveness of a bundled intervention of decolonization and prophylaxis to decrease Gram positive surgical site infections after cardiac or orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marin Schweizer; Eli Perencevich; Jennifer McDanel; Jennifer Carson; Michelle Formanek; Joanne Hafner; Barbara Braun; Loreen Herwaldt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-06-13

Review 9.  Targeting agr- and agr-Like quorum sensing systems for development of common therapeutics to treat multiple gram-positive bacterial infections.

Authors:  Brian Gray; Pamela Hall; Hattie Gresham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Special issues involving periprosthetic infection in immunodeficiency patients.

Authors:  Eduard Tornero; Josep Riba; Sebastian Garcia-Ramiro
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-06-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.