PURPOSE: Although the inpatient setting has served as the predominant educational site of internal medicine training programs, many changes and factors are currently affecting education in this setting. As a result, many educational organizations are calling for reforms in inpatient training. This report reviews the available literature on specific internal medicine inpatient educational interventions and proposes recommendations for improving internal medicine training in this setting. METHOD: We searched Medline for articles published between 1966 and August 2004 which focused on internal medicine training interventions in the inpatient setting; bibliographies of Medline-identified articles, as well as articles suggested by experts in the field provided additional citations. We then reviewed, classified, and abstracted only articles where an assessment of learner outcomes was included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies of inpatient internal medicine educational interventions were found that included an outcome assessment. All were single institution studies. The majority of these studies was of poor methodological quality and focused on specific content areas of internal medicine. None assessed the effectiveness or impact of internal medicine core inpatient experiences or curriculum. CONCLUSION: This review identifies significant gaps in our understanding of what constitutes effective inpatient education. The paucity of high quality research in the internal medicine inpatient setting highlights the urgent need to formally define and study what constitutes an effective "core" inpatient curriculum.
PURPOSE: Although the inpatient setting has served as the predominant educational site of internal medicine training programs, many changes and factors are currently affecting education in this setting. As a result, many educational organizations are calling for reforms in inpatient training. This report reviews the available literature on specific internal medicine inpatient educational interventions and proposes recommendations for improving internal medicine training in this setting. METHOD: We searched Medline for articles published between 1966 and August 2004 which focused on internal medicine training interventions in the inpatient setting; bibliographies of Medline-identified articles, as well as articles suggested by experts in the field provided additional citations. We then reviewed, classified, and abstracted only articles where an assessment of learner outcomes was included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies of inpatient internal medicine educational interventions were found that included an outcome assessment. All were single institution studies. The majority of these studies was of poor methodological quality and focused on specific content areas of internal medicine. None assessed the effectiveness or impact of internal medicine core inpatient experiences or curriculum. CONCLUSION: This review identifies significant gaps in our understanding of what constitutes effective inpatient education. The paucity of high quality research in the internal medicine inpatient setting highlights the urgent need to formally define and study what constitutes an effective "core" inpatient curriculum.
Authors: S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; David Lee Gordon; Stephen Symes; Emil R Petrusa; Ian R Hart; Ronald M Harden Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Mark E Kulaga; Pamela Charney; Stephen P O'Mahony; Joseph P Cleary; Timothy M McClung; Donald E Schildkamp; Eric M Mazur Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Dawn M T Bravata; Stephen J Huot; Hadley S Abernathy; Kelley M Skeff; Dena M C Bravata Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2003-10-22 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Francine C Wiest; Timothy G Ferris; Manjusha Gokhale; Eric G Campbell; Joel S Weissman; David Blumenthal Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lisa L Willett; Carlos A Estrada; Terry C Wall; Heather L Coley; Julius Ngu; William Curry; Amanda Salanitro; Thomas K Houston Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2011-06
Authors: Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Rachel Stark; Ira M Helenius; Laura M Schimming; Nogusa Takahara; Ian Kronish; Deborah Korenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-10-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Frederick D Tsai; Brendan Guercio; Sherri Stuver; Robert Stern; Michael J Peluso; Marissa Winkler; Sorbarikor Piawah; Mounica Vallurupalli; Marlise R Luskin; David Braun; Alexander Parent; Brett Glotzbecker; Kerry Laing Kilbridge Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 2.037