Literature DB >> 16422990

The penile implant for erectile dysfunction.

John J Mulcahy1, Edouardo Austoni, James H Barada, Hyung Ki Choi, W J Hellstrom, Wayne J G Hellstrom, Sudhakar Krishnamurti, Ignacio Moncada, Dirk Schultheiss, Dirk Shultheiss, Michael Sohn, Hunter Wessells.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Penile prostheses, introduced as the first effective organic treatment for erectile dysfunction over three decades ago, have an important role in the treatment of erectile dysfunction when other nonprosthetic treatment options have proven unsatisfactory. Although they are the least chosen and most invasive treatment option, they have the highest satisfaction rate of all available ED options and provide a predictable and reliable result. AIM: To provide recommendations/guidelines concerning state-of-the-art knowledge for utilization of the penile prosthesis in the management of men with erectile dysfunction.
METHODS: An International Consultation in collaboration with the major sexual medicine associations assembled over 200 multidisciplinary experts from 60 countries into 17 committees. Committee members established specific objectives and scopes for various sexual medicine topics. The recommendations concerning state-of-the-art knowledge in the respective sexual medicine topic represent the opinion of experts from five continents developed in a process over a 2-year period. There were 10 experts from seven countries concerning the Penile Implant for Erectile Dysfunction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion was based on grading of evidence-based medical literature, widespread internal committee discussion, public presentation and debate.
RESULTS: Recommendations/guidelines for penile prosthesis (hydraulic, semi-rigid and soft silicone) insertion for management of men with erectile dysfunction were updated. Consensed issues included: criteria for patient selection, informed consent procedures, strategies for preoperative preparation, operative incisions/technical considerations and outcome results in terms of patient satisfaction and device survival. Updated information was reviewed concerning therapies for device failures, device insertion in scarred corporal bodies and strategies for managing implant infections.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for more research in developing management strategies for insertion of penile prostheses in men with ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16422990     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10115.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current Status for Semirigid Penile Prosthetic Devices.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Justin Parker; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  "Pumpology": the Realistic Issues Associated with Pump Placement in Prosthetic Surgery.

Authors:  Raul E Fernandez-Crespo; Kristina Buscaino; Rafael Carrion
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.

Authors:  F Akdemir; E Okulu; Ö Kayıgil
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 4.  Erectile Dysfunction: A Review of Historical Treatments With a Focus on the Development of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.

Authors:  Kristen Gurtner; Amanda Saltzman; Kristi Hebert; Eric Laborde
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 5.  Current management of penile implant infections, device reliability, and optimizing cosmetic outcome.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Andrew Kramer; William O Brant; Justin L Parker; Paul E Perito; Jeremy B Myers; Richard Bryson; Meagan Dunne
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Penile prosthesis implantation in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction: 10-year experience.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Song; Yi-Ming Yuan; Wan-Shou Cui; Alex K Wu; Yi-Chen Zhu; Jing Liu; Lin Wang; Guang-Yi Bai; Jing Peng; Zhi-Chao Zhang; Bing Gao; Ying-Lu Guo; Tom F Lue; Zhong-Cheng Xin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Uzoma A Anele; Brian V Le; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.491

8.  Surgical outcomes and complications of Tube® (Promedon) malleable penile prostheses in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Elnisr Rashed Mohamed; Ahmed Rashed Hammady; Mohamed Zaki Eldahshoury; Ahmed Mamdouh Elsharkawi; Ahmed Mahmoud Riad; Hazem Mohamed Elmogazy; Mohamed Mostafa Hussien; Wael Mohamed Gamal
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-08-25

9.  Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications.

Authors:  G Antonini; G M Busetto; E De Berardinis; R Giovannone; P Vicini; F Del Giudice; S L Conti; V Gentile; P E Perito
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation: are malleable prostheses an appropriate treatment option in patients with erectile dysfunction caused by prior radical surgery?

Authors:  Cuneyd Sevinc; Orkunt Ozkaptan; Muhsin Balaban; Ugur Yucetas; Tahir Karadeniz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.