Literature DB >> 23872664

Penile prosthesis implantation in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction: 10-year experience.

Wei-Dong Song1, Yi-Ming Yuan, Wan-Shou Cui, Alex K Wu, Yi-Chen Zhu, Jing Liu, Lin Wang, Guang-Yi Bai, Jing Peng, Zhi-Chao Zhang, Bing Gao, Ying-Lu Guo, Tom F Lue, Zhong-Cheng Xin.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction (SED). From July 2000 to December 2011, 224 patients (mean age: 35.9±11.8 years, range: 20-75 years) with SED underwent PPI by experienced surgeon according to standard PPI procedure at our centre. A malleable prosthesis (AMS 650) was implanted in 45 cases (20.1%), and a three-piece inflatable prosthesis (AMS 700 CXM or AMS 700 CXR) was implanted in 179 cases (79.9%). Surgical outcomes, including postoperative complications, clinical efficacy and couple satisfaction, were evaluated over than 6 months postoperatively using medical record abstraction, IIEF-5, quality of life (QoL) scores, and the patient/partner sexual satisfaction score proposed by Bhojwani et al. Of the 224 patients eligible for the study, 201 subjects (89.7%) completed follow-up. All of patients could perform sexual intercourse post PPI with the mean postoperative IIEF-5 and QoL scores were 20.02±2.32 and 5.28±0.76, respectively, which were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores (6.29±1.5 and 2.13±0.84, P<0.01). Of the 201 men, mechanical malfunction occurred in four cases (2.0%) and three cases were re-implanted new device, and two cases (1.0%) developed a mild curvature of the penis. Scrotal erosion with infection occurred in one case with diabetes mellitus (0.5%) and required complete removal of the implanted AMS 700 CXM. Satisfactory sexual intercourse at least twice per month was reported by 178 men (88.6%), and overall satisfaction with the PPI surgery was reported by 89.0% of men and 82.5% of partners. Patient satisfaction in the three-piece inflatable prosthesis group was higher than in the malleable prosthesis group (P<0.05). Satisfaction, however, between the types of prostheses, did not differ in the partner survey. PPI is a safe and effective treatment option for Chinese patients with SED and experienced surgeon perform PPI according to standard PPI procedure could reduce the postoperative complications of PPI and could improve patient satisfaction ratio and QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872664      PMCID: PMC3881644          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2013.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  18 in total

Review 1.  Penile prosthesis surgery: a review of prosthetic devices and associated complications.

Authors:  Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Clinical features and treatment options for Chinese patients with severe primary erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Yi-Chen Zhu; Jing-Liang Zhao; Yi-Guang Wu; Yi-Ming Yuan; Wen-Qing Lian; Jian Zhang; Wan-Shou Cui; Jin Zhe; Zhong-Cheng Xin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; David J Ralph; John P Pryor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  The penile implant for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Edouardo Austoni; James H Barada; Hyung Ki Choi; W J Hellstrom; Wayne J G Hellstrom; Sudhakar Krishnamurti; Ignacio Moncada; Dirk Schultheiss; Dirk Shultheiss; Michael Sohn; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  [Penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction].

Authors:  G Atienza Merino
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.994

6.  Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Kenneth H Ferguson; R Duane Cespedes
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Comparative assessment of antimicrobial activities of antibiotic-treated penile prostheses.

Authors:  Mohammad D Mansouri; Timothy B Boone; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  [Epidemiological changes of ED patients: investigations in 11 Chinese cities during the past 5 years].

Authors:  De-Feng Liu; Hui Jiang; Kai Hong; Lian-Ming Zhao; Lu-Lin Ma; Ji-Chuan Zhu
Journal:  Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue       Date:  2009-08

9.  Clinical experience with 180 inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  E R Randrup
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Sustained efficacy and tolerability of vardenafil, a highly potent selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in men with erectile dysfunction: results of a randomized, double-blind, 26-week placebo-controlled pivotal trial.

Authors:  Wayne J G Hellstrom; Marc Gittelman; Gary Karlin; Thomas Segerson; Marc Thibonnier; Terry Taylor; Harin Padma-Nathan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Carlo Bettocchi; Paulo Egydio; Chris Love; Daniar Osmonov; Sean Park; David Ralph; Zhong Cheng Xin; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  Surgical outcomes and complications of Tube® (Promedon) malleable penile prostheses in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Elnisr Rashed Mohamed; Ahmed Rashed Hammady; Mohamed Zaki Eldahshoury; Ahmed Mamdouh Elsharkawi; Ahmed Mahmoud Riad; Hazem Mohamed Elmogazy; Mohamed Mostafa Hussien; Wael Mohamed Gamal
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-08-25

Review 3.  Medical pre-operative considerations for patients undergoing penile implantation.

Authors:  Thomas A Masterson; Joseph Palmer; Justin Dubin; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 4.  Role of Penile Prosthesis in Priapism: A Review.

Authors:  Amit G Reddy; Laith M Alzweri; Andrew T Gabrielson; Gabriel Leinwand; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.400

5.  Dynamic Penile Corpora Cavernosa Reconstruction Using Bilateral Innervated Gracilis Muscles: A Preclinical Investigation.

Authors:  Zhuming Yin; Liqiang Liu; Bingjian Xue; Jincai Fan; Wenlin Chen; Zheng Liu
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 6.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

7.  Dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography for classifying venous erectile dysfunction and its significance for individual treatment.

Authors:  Qing-Qiang Gao; Jian-Huai Chen; Yun Chen; Tao Song; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.