Literature DB >> 32748685

'Doublecheck: a sensory confirmation is required to own a robotic hand, sending a command to feel in charge of it'.

M Pinardi1, F Ferrari2,3, M D'Alonzo1, F Clemente2,3, L Raiano1, C Cipriani2,3, G Di Pino1.   

Abstract

Over a lifetime of experience, the representation of the body is built upon congruent integration of multiple elements constituting the sensorimotor loop. To investigate its robustness against the rupture of congruency between senses and with motor command, we selectively manipulated in healthy subjects the binds between sight, proprioception, and efferent motor command. Two experiments based on the Moving Hand Illusion were designed employing Tendon Vibration Illusion to modulate proprioception and generate illusory altered feedback of movement. In Experiment A, visuomotor congruency was modulated by introducing adelay between complex multifingered movements performed by arobotic hand and real movement of each participant's hand. In the presence of the motor command, visuomotor congruency enhanced ownership, agency, and skin conductance, while proprioceptive-motor congruency was not effective, confirming the prevalence of vision upon proprioception. In Experiment B, the impact of visuo-proprioceptive congruency was tested in the absence of motor command because the robotic hand moved autonomously. Intersensory congruency compensated for the absence of motor command only for ownership. Skin conductance in Exp Band Proprioceptive Drift in both experiments did not change. Results suggest that ownership and agency are independently processed, and presence of the efferent component modulates sensory feedbacks salience. The brain seems to require the integration of at least two streams of congruent information. Bodily awareness can be generated from sensory information alone, but to feel in charge of the body, senses must be double-checked with the prediction generated from efference copy, which is treated as an additional sensory modality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sensorimotor; agency; efference copy; embodiment; multisensory integration; ownership

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32748685      PMCID: PMC7613204          DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2020.1793751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1758-8928            Impact factor:   2.550


  56 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception.

Authors:  Z Pylyshyn
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons.

Authors:  Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki; Christopher R Fetsch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Movement and the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Timothy Dummer; Alexandra Picot-Annand; Tristan Neal; Chris Moore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Moving a Rubber Hand that Feels Like Your Own: A Dissociation of Ownership and Agency.

Authors:  Andreas Kalckert; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Over Ventral Premotor Cortex or Inferior Parietal Lobule Does Not Enhance the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Alessandro Mioli; Marco D'Alonzo; Giovanni Pellegrino; Domenico Formica; Giovanni Di Pino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Vibrotactile sensory substitution elicits feeling of ownership of an alien hand.

Authors:  Marco D'Alonzo; Christian Cipriani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Augmentation-related brain plasticity.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Angelo Maravita; Loredana Zollo; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Sensory- and Action-Oriented Embodiment of Neurally-Interfaced Robotic Hand Prostheses.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Daniele Romano; Chiara Spaccasassi; Alessandro Mioli; Marco D'Alonzo; Rinaldo Sacchetti; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Loredana Zollo; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Vincenzo Denaro; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.152

View more
  1 in total

1.  Embodying an artificial hand increases blood flow to the investigated limb [version 3; peer review: 2 approved].

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Alessandro Mioli; Claudia Altamura; Marco D'Alonzo
Journal:  Open Res Eur       Date:  2022-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.