Literature DB >> 1641682

Patients' choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions.

S Legg England1, J Evans.   

Abstract

Previous search indicates that treatment outcomes may be improved if patients perceive greater control over their treatment, but the practical implications of encouraging patients to take more control have not been investigated. The present study investigated responses of 143 patients in a cardiovascular risk management clinic to an invitation to make a decision about their treatment. Subjects' choices of the target behaviour for their behaviour-change treatment were highly predictable from their state of health, reasons for coming to the clinic, what behaviours they were told they were at risk from, and contacts with health workers. The degree of control that subjects reported they had over the decision varied considerably, being negatively related to blood pressure and positively related to the degree of control that subjects believed they had over their health in general. Issues such as time-demands, the practitioner's job satisfaction, and ethical implications of patient participation are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641682     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90314-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  9 in total

1.  Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?

Authors:  A Coulter; V Entwistle; D Gilbert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-30

2.  Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care.

Authors:  E Murray; H Davis; S S Tai; A Coulter; A Gray; A Haines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

3.  What can patients do to improve health care?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Richard Grol
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Adherence and weight loss outcomes associated with food-exercise diary preference in a military weight management program.

Authors:  Laura E Shay; Diane Seibert; Dorraine Watts; Tracy Sbrocco; Claire Pagliara
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2009-07-16

Review 5.  On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?

Authors:  Andrew D M Kennedy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Patient participation in decision-making on the introduction of home respiratory care: who does not participate?

Authors:  Päivi M Hämäläinen; Marja-Leena Perälä; Tuija Poussa; Marjaana Pelkonen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patients' prerogatives and perceptions of benefit.

Authors:  F Kee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-13

8.  Japanese cancer patient participation in and satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Yoshiko Watanabe; Miyako Takahashi; Ichiro Kai
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Cornelia M Borkhoff; Joanne Lally; Carrie A Levin; Daniel D Matlock; Chirk Jenn Ng; Mary E Ropka; Dawn Stacey; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Celia E Wills; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.