Literature DB >> 8616314

Patients' prerogatives and perceptions of benefit.

F Kee1.   

Abstract

Patients today demand more information about their treatment. Doctors, however, seem reluctant to cast aside ingrained habits of paternalism, believing they can best interpret therapeutic choices for their patients. Whether doctors can be more objective and effective than patients in interpreting the "probabilities" of medical evidence is open to question. On the other hand, the exercise of choice by patients may itself have a bearing on the probabilities of outcome. Involving patients more in making therapeutic choices is justified if doctors can present options in an unbiased and effective manner and if the process improves the outcome of the care delivered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8616314      PMCID: PMC2350793          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7036.958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  31 in total

1.  Physicians' views on the level of medical information among patients.

Authors:  L PRATT; A SELIGMANN; G READER
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1957-10

2.  Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: the influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1987-06

3.  Adherence to aspirin in the prevention of myocardial infarction. The Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  R J Glynn; J E Buring; J E Manson; F LaMotte; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994 Dec 12-26

4.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; E J Lusk; D S Miller; S Hurwitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas; M J McGreal; E C Thiel; S Fine; C Erlichman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment: application of a socio-organizational perspective.

Authors:  B A Schulman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The effect of physician's explanations on patients' treatment preferences: five-year survival data.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; R I Kopelman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Psychologically mediated effects of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  H C Sox; I Margulies; C H Sox
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  9 in total

1.  Feudal lords of science and medicine.

Authors:  J Borgstein; J Watine
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-08

2.  Patients' perceptions of omitted examinations and tests: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; E J Callahan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  N of 1 trials. Placebos should be abandoned.

Authors:  W Treasure
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

4.  Breast cancer: asking patients what they want.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-31

Review 5.  Future prospects for evidence-based child health.

Authors:  R Gilbert; S Logan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study.

Authors:  F Kee; P McDonald; B Gaffney
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-09

8.  What can patients do to improve health care?

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Richard Grol
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A. Sawka; Vivek Goel; Catherine A. Mahut; Glen A. Taylor; Elaine C. Thiel; Annette M. O'Connor; Ida Ackerman; Janet H. Burt; Elaine H. Gort
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.