Literature DB >> 19778751

Adherence and weight loss outcomes associated with food-exercise diary preference in a military weight management program.

Laura E Shay1, Diane Seibert, Dorraine Watts, Tracy Sbrocco, Claire Pagliara.   

Abstract

The more consistently someone records their food intake the more likely they are to lose weight. We hypothesized that subjects who kept track via their preferred method would demonstrate higher adherence and therefore improved outcomes compared to those who used a non-preferred method. Participants were randomly assigned to use a paper, PDA, or Web-based diary and classified as "Preferred" if they used their preferred method and "Non-Preferred" if they did not. Days adherent to diary use were collected for 12 weeks. Weight, % body fat, waist circumference, and self-efficacy scores were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Thirty nine participants completed the 12 week study. Fifty nine percent were male. The mean age was 35 and mean baseline BMI was 33 kg/m(2) (+/-3.5). Forty four % (n=17) used their "Preferred" diary method and 56% (n=22) did not. Participants who used their preferred diary were more adherent to recording both food intake (64.2% vs. 43.4%, p=.015) and exercise (60.6% vs. 31.2%, p=.001). Though no difference was seen between groups on weight management outcomes, these results suggest that diary preference affects adherence to diary use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19778751      PMCID: PMC3936599          DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  38 in total

1.  Lack of efficacy of a food-frequency questionnaire in assessing dietary macronutrient intakes in subjects consuming diets of known composition.

Authors:  E J Schaefer; J L Augustin; M M Schaefer; H Rasmussen; J M Ordovas; G E Dallal; J T Dwyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Ancillary study to the PREFER trial: a descriptive study of participants' patterns of self-monitoring--rationale, design and preliminary experiences.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Susan Sereika; Jina Choo; Melanie Warziski; Edvin Music; Mindi Styn; Jessica Novak; Arthur Stone
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Patients' choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions.

Authors:  S Legg England; J Evans
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Behavioral interventions for obesity.

Authors:  Laverne A Berkel; Walker S Carlos Poston; Rebecca S Reeves; John P Foreyt
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-05

5.  Changes in self-efficacy and decisional balance for exercise among obese women in a weight management program.

Authors:  B M Pinto; M M Clark; D G Cruess; L Szymanski; V Pera
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1999-05

Review 6.  Control of food intake in the obese.

Authors:  J E Blundell; A Gillett
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-11

7.  PREFER study: a randomized clinical trial testing treatment preference and two dietary options in behavioral weight management--rationale, design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jina Choo; Edvin Music; Melanie Warziski; Mindi A Styn; Yookyung Kim; Mary Ann Sevick
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Analysis of changes in eating behavior and weight loss in type II diabetic patients. Which behaviors to change.

Authors:  J C Guare; R R Wing; M D Marcus; L H Epstein; L R Burton; W E Gooding
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of successful weight control.

Authors:  K N Boutelle; D S Kirschenbaum
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-05

Review 10.  Adherence, patient preference and dosing frequency: understanding the relationship.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; V Rabenda; A Neuprez
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jing Wang; Mary Ann Sevick
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  The effect of computers for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Virginia A Reed; Karen E Schifferdecker; Michael E Rezaee; Sharon O'Connor; Robin J Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Weight-Related Information Avoidance Prospectively Predicts Poorer Self-Monitoring and Engagement in a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention.

Authors:  Leah M Schumacher; Mary K Martinelli; Alexandra D Convertino; Evan M Forman; Meghan L Butryn
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16

4.  Defining Adherence to Mobile Dietary Self-Monitoring and Assessing Tracking Over Time: Tracking at Least Two Eating Occasions per Day Is Best Marker of Adherence within Two Different Mobile Health Randomized Weight Loss Interventions.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Caroline Glagola Dunn; Sara Wilcox; Alycia K Boutté; Brent Hutto; Adam Hoover; Eric Muth
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Physical activity self-monitoring and weight loss: 6-month results of the SMART trial.

Authors:  Molly B Conroy; Kyeongra Yang; Okan U Elci; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Mindi A Styn; Jing Wang; Andrea M Kriska; Susan M Sereika; Lora E Burke
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 6.  When does personalized feedback make a difference? A narrative review of recent findings and their implications for promoting better diabetes self-care.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people.

Authors:  L Susan Wieland; Louise Falzon; Chris N Sciamanna; Kimberlee J Trudeau; Suzanne Brodney; Joseph E Schwartz; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

8.  Technology- and Phone-Based Weight Loss Intervention: Pilot RCT in Women at Elevated Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Sheri J Hartman; Sandahl H Nelson; Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara A Parker; John P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 9.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 10.  The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Free; Gemma Phillips; Leandro Galli; Louise Watson; Lambert Felix; Phil Edwards; Vikram Patel; Andy Haines
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.