Literature DB >> 11532844

Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care.

E Murray1, H Davis, S S Tai, A Coulter, A Gray, A Haines.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a decision aid on hormone replacement therapy influences decision making and health outcomes.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: 26 general practices in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 205 women considering hormone replacement therapy. INTERVENTION: Patients' decision aid consisting of an interactive multimedia programme with booklet and printed summary. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' and general practitioners' perceptions of who made the decision, decisional conflict, treatment choice, menopausal symptoms, costs, anxiety, and general health status.
RESULTS: Both patients and general practitioners found the decision aid acceptable. At three months, mean scores for decisional conflict were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (2.5 v 2.8; mean difference -0.3, 95% confidence interval -0.5 to -0.2); this difference was maintained during follow up. A higher proportion of general practitioners perceived that treatment decisions had been made "mainly or only" by the patient in the intervention group than in the control group (55% v 31%; 24%, 8% to 40%). At three months a lower proportion of women in the intervention group than in the control group were undecided about treatment (14% v 26%; -12%, -23% to -0.4%), and a higher proportion had decided against hormone replacement therapy (46% v 32%; 14%, 1% to 28%); these differences were no longer apparent by nine months. No differences were found between the groups for anxiety, use of health service resources, general health status, or utility. The higher costs of the intervention were largely due to the video disc technology used.
CONCLUSIONS: An interactive multimedia decision aid in the NHS would be popular with patients, reduce decisional conflict, and let patients play a more active part in decision making without increasing anxiety. The use of web based technology would reduce the cost of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11532844      PMCID: PMC48137          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

1.  The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  A M Wolf; J F Nasser; A M Wolf; J B Schorling
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-06-24

2.  Patients' choices and perceptions after an invitation to participate in treatment decisions.

Authors:  S Legg England; J Evans
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Patients' health-care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations.

Authors:  H A Llewellyn-Thomas
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  A B Flood; J E Wennberg; R F Nease; F J Fowler; J Ding; L M Hynes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views.

Authors:  C Meredith; P Symonds; L Webster; D Lamont; E Pyper; C R Gillis; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

7.  Utilisation of hormone replacement therapy by women doctors.

Authors:  A J Isaacs; A R Britton; K McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-25

8.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

Authors:  J E Brazier; R Harper; N M Jones; A O'Cathain; K J Thomas; T Usherwood; L Westlake
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-18

9.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Authors:  T M Marteau; H Bekker
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-09

10.  The time trade-off method: results from a general population study.

Authors:  P Dolan; C Gudex; P Kind; A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  38 in total

1.  A key medical decision maker: the patient.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-01

2.  Use of interactive multimedia decision aids. Alternative explanation for results may exist.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-02

Review 3.  Early intervention in schizophrenia: three frameworks for guiding ethical inquiry.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  I am a good patient, believe it or not.

Authors:  Alejandro R Jadad; Carlos A Rizo; Murray W Enkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

5.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain language.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sue Stableford; Angela Fagerlin; John T Wei; Rodney L Dunn; Janet Ohene-Frempong; Karen Kelly-Blake; David R Rovner
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Interventions for improving older patients' involvement in primary care episodes.

Authors:  R Wetzels; M Harmsen; C Van Weel; R Grol; M Wensing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

8.  A failure to communicate: patients with cerebral aneurysms and vascular neurosurgeons.

Authors:  J T King; H Yonas; M B Horowitz; A B Kassam; M S Roberts
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 9.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Development and description of a decision analysis based decision support tool for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard Thomson; Angela Robinson; Jane Greenaway; Philip Lowe
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.