Hale Çolakoğlu Er1, Elif Peker2, Ayşe Erden2, İlhan Erden2, Ethem Geçim3, Berna Savaş4. 1. 1 Department of Radiology,University of Gaziantep, Assistant Professor, School of Medicine , University of Gaziantep, Assistant Professor, School of Medicine , Gaziantep , Turkey. 2. 2 Department of Radiology,Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey. 3. 3 Department of General Surgery,Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey. 4. 4 Department of Pathology,Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara University, Professor, School of Medicine , Ankara , Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of 3 Tesla MR imaging in detection of mucosal (Tis), submucosal (T1) and muscularis propria (T2) invasion in patients with early rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients who underwent 3 Tesla MR imaging and curative-intent intervention for MRI-staged Tis/T1/T2 rectal cancer from March 2012 to December 2016 were included. The radiological T category of each rectal tumour was compared retrospectively with histopathological results assessed according to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification. The sensitivities, specificities, and overall accuracy rates of 3 Tesla MR imaging for Tis, T1, and T2 cases were calculated using MedCalc statistical software v. 16. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 3 Tesla MR imaging in T categorization for T2 were: 93.7% [95% CI (0.79-0.99)], 77.7% [95% CI (0.52-0.93)], 88.2% [95% CI (0.75-0.94)] and 87.5% [95% CI (0.64-0.96)]; for T1 were 92% [95% CI (0.63-0.99)], 91.8% [95% CI (0.78-0.98)], 80% [95% CI (0.57-0.92)] and 97.1% [95% CI (0.83-0.99)]; for Tis were: 20% [95% CI (0.51-0.71)], 100% [95% CI (0.92-1)], 100%, 91.8% [95% CI (0.87-0.94)], respectively. MR categorization accuracy rates for T2, T1 and Tis were calculated as 88, 92 and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3 Tesla MR imaging seems to be useful for accurate categorization of T-stage in early rectal cancer, especially for T1 cancers. The method is not a reliable tool to detect Tis cases. The potential for overstaging and understaging of the technique should be realized and taken into consideration when tailoring the treatment protocol for each patient. Advances in knowledge: High-resolution MR with phased-array coil is being increasingly used in the pre-operative assessment of rectal cancer. 3 Tesla high-resolution MR imaging allows improved definition of bowel wall and tumour infiltration.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of 3 Tesla MR imaging in detection of mucosal (Tis), submucosal (T1) and muscularis propria (T2) invasion in patients with early rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive patients who underwent 3 Tesla MR imaging and curative-intent intervention for MRI-staged Tis/T1/T2 rectal cancer from March 2012 to December 2016 were included. The radiological T category of each rectal tumour was compared retrospectively with histopathological results assessed according to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification. The sensitivities, specificities, and overall accuracy rates of 3 Tesla MR imaging for Tis, T1, and T2 cases were calculated using MedCalc statistical software v. 16. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 3 Tesla MR imaging in T categorization for T2 were: 93.7% [95% CI (0.79-0.99)], 77.7% [95% CI (0.52-0.93)], 88.2% [95% CI (0.75-0.94)] and 87.5% [95% CI (0.64-0.96)]; for T1 were 92% [95% CI (0.63-0.99)], 91.8% [95% CI (0.78-0.98)], 80% [95% CI (0.57-0.92)] and 97.1% [95% CI (0.83-0.99)]; for Tis were: 20% [95% CI (0.51-0.71)], 100% [95% CI (0.92-1)], 100%, 91.8% [95% CI (0.87-0.94)], respectively. MR categorization accuracy rates for T2, T1 and Tis were calculated as 88, 92 and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3 Tesla MR imaging seems to be useful for accurate categorization of T-stage in early rectal cancer, especially for T1 cancers. The method is not a reliable tool to detect Tis cases. The potential for overstaging and understaging of the technique should be realized and taken into consideration when tailoring the treatment protocol for each patient. Advances in knowledge: High-resolution MR with phased-array coil is being increasingly used in the pre-operative assessment of rectal cancer. 3 Tesla high-resolution MR imaging allows improved definition of bowel wall and tumour infiltration.
Authors: Geneviève Veereman; Joan Vlayen; Jo Robays; Nicolas Fairon; Sabine Stordeur; Christian Rolfo; Didier Bielen; Alain Bols; Pieter Demetter; André D'hoore; Karin Haustermans; Alain Hendlisz; Arnaud Lemmers; Daniel Leonard; Freddy Penninckx; Eric Van Cutsem; Marc Peeters Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Satoshi Okabe; Jinru Shia; Garrett Nash; W Douglas Wong; José G Guillem; Martin R Weiser; Larissa Temple; Kenichi Sugihara; Philip B Paty Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Courtney C Moreno; Patrick S Sullivan; Bobby T Kalb; Russell G Tipton; Krisztina Z Hanley; Hiroumi D Kitajima; W Thomas Dixon; John R Votaw; John N Oshinski; Pardeep K Mittal Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2015-10
Authors: S Rasheed; D M Bowley; O Aziz; P P Tekkis; A E Sadat; T Guenther; M L Boello; P J McDonald; I C Talbot; J M A Northover Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Monique Maas; Doenja M J Lambregts; Max J Lahaye; Geerard L Beets; Walter Backes; Roy F A Vliegen; Margreet Osinga-de Jong; Joachim E Wildberger; Regina G H Beets-Tan Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2012-06