Literature DB >> 20012295

Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Paul Hermanek1, Susanne Merkel, Rainer Fietkau, Claus Rödel, Werner Hohenberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: For rectal carcinoma treated according to the concept of total mesorectal excision (TME surgery), the independent influence of regional lymph node metastasis on the locoregional recurrence risk is still in discussion. A reliable assessment of this risk is important for an individualised selective indication for neoadjuvant radio-/radiochemotherapy.
METHODS: Analysis of literature, especially of the last 20 years, and consideration of pathological and oncological basic research. Multivariate analysis of data of the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Carcinoma.
RESULTS: The clinical assessment of the pretherapeutic regional lymph node status by the present available imaging methods is still unreliable. The analysis of the association between pretherapeutic regional lymph node status and locoregional recurrence risk has to be based on follow-up data of patients treated by primary surgery and has to be distinguished between patients treated by conventional and optimised quality-assured TME surgery, respectively. Data from Erlangen show an increase of the local recurrence risk for patients with at least four involved regional lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with at least four involved regional lymph nodes, a neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy may be indicated. However, today, the pretherapeutic diagnosis is uncertain and results in overtherapy in 40%. Thus, in case of positive lymph node findings by imaging methods, the benefits and risk of neoadjuvant therapy in such situations should always be discussed with the patient in the sense of informed consent and shared decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20012295     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0864-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  87 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of lateral lymph node micrometastases in lower rectal cancer: an immunohistochemical study with CAM5.2.

Authors:  Masaaki Shimoyama; Toshiyuki Yamazaki; Takeyasu Suda; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Is the lateral lymph node compartment relevant?

Authors:  Moritz Koch; Peter Kienle; Dalibor Antolovic; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Neil Smith; Gina Brown
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Shiozawa; Makoto Akaike; Roppei Yamada; Teni Godai; Naoto Yamamoto; Hiroshige Saito; Yukio Sugimasa; Shoji Takemiya; Yasushi Rino; Toshio Imada
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2007-06

5.  Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.

Authors:  M Ueno; M Oya; K Azekura; T Yamaguchi; T Muto
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Recurrence and survival after surgical management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Ross; C Rusnak; B Weinerman; P Kuechler; A Hayashi; G MacLachlan; E Frew; W Dunlop
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Prognostic groups in 1,676 patients with T3 rectal cancer treated without preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Morten T Eriksen; Arne Wibe; Jon Haffner; Johan N Wiig
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  [Rectal carcinoma: is too much neoadjuvant therapy performed? Proposals for a more selective MRI based indication].

Authors:  Th Junginger; P Hermanek; K Oberholzer; H Schmidberger
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for nodal staging in patients with primary rectal cancer: predictive criteria.

Authors:  Max J Lahaye; Sanne M E Engelen; Alfons G H Kessels; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  MRI directed multidisciplinary team preoperative treatment strategy: the way to eliminate positive circumferential margins?

Authors:  S Burton; G Brown; I R Daniels; A R Norman; B Mason; D Cunningham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  How Should Imaging Direct/Orient Management of Rectal Cancer?

Authors:  Jemma Bhoday; Svetlana Balyasnikova; Anita Wale; Gina Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Rectal cancer : when is the local recurrence risk low enough to refrain from the aim to prevent it?

Authors:  M L Sautter-Bihl; W Hohenberger; R Fietkau; C Rödel; H Schmidberger; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Carsta Koehler; Juliane Stelzer; Anja Sims; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Short-term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Clemens Schubert; Erik Puffer; Gunter Haroske; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Quality assurance of pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for advanced lower rectal cancer--preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tadahiko Masaki; Hiroyoshi Matsuoka; Takaaki Kobayashi; Nobutsugu Abe; Makoto Takayama; Ayako Tonari; Masanori Sugiyama; Yutaka Atomi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Locally recurrent colorectal cancer: results of surgical therapy.

Authors:  M Kruschewski; M Ciurea; S Lipka; S Daum; L Moser; B Meyer; J Gröne; J Budczies; H J Buhr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Use of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Select Patients with Rectal Cancer for Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation--Interim Analysis of the German OCUM Trial (NCT01325649).

Authors:  Martin E Kreis; R Ruppert; H Ptok; J Strassburg; P Brosi; A Lewin; M R Schön; J Sauer; T Junginger; S Merkel; P Hermanek
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound for diagnosis of rectal lesions.

Authors:  Franciszek Burdan; Iwona Sudol-Szopinska; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Malgorzata Kolodziejczak; Robert Klepacz; Agnieszka Mocarska; Marek Caban; Iwonna Zelazowska-Cieslinska; Justyna Szumilo
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 9.  Imaging paradigms in assessment of rectal carcinoma: loco-regional and distant staging.

Authors:  Thian Yee Liang; Gopinathan Anil; Bertrand W L Ang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Rectal cancer staging: focus on the prognostic significance of the findings described by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriana Dieguez
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.