Literature DB >> 16416144

Why does the phonological similarity effect reverse with nonwords?

Paul Johan Karlsen1, Anders Gravir Imenes, Kaja Johannessen, Tor Endestad, Arild Lian.   

Abstract

The detrimental phonological similarity effect (PSE), a robust finding in serial recall of words, sometimes reverses with nonwords. The current study tested the hypothesis that nonwords benefit from phonological similarity because they are harder to retrieve. In two experiments serial recall and serial reconstruction of visually presented words and nonwords were compared. Phonological similarity is known to have a positive effect on item memory and a negative effect on position accuracy in serial recall, and the demands on item retrieval were greatly reduced in the latter task. PSE occurred for words in both tasks and was reversed for nonwords in serial recall, but not in serial reconstruction-a new finding in the literature. The following conclusions can be made: (1) the detrimental PSE on order retrieval occurs irrespective of lexicality, in accordance with prominent short-term memory models; and (2), the positive PSE on item retrieval is crucially affected by lexicality, a finding less well explained by the existing models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16416144     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0042-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Think before you speak: pauses, memory search, and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span.

Authors:  C Hulme; P Newton; N Cowan; G Stuart; G Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  A re-evaluation of the phonological similarity effect in adults' short-term memory of words and nonwords.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul J. Karlsen; Bendik Winsvold
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-07

3.  All parts of an item are not equal: effects of phonological redundancy on immediate recall.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

4.  A REPLICATION OF FREE RECALL AND ORDERING OF TRIGRAMS.

Authors:  E C CARTERETTE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-09

5.  INFORMATION, ACOUSTIC CONFUSION AND MEMORY SPAN.

Authors:  R CONRAD; A J HULL
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1964-11

6.  Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen; Thor Birger Eriksen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-05

7.  The phonological similarity effect in serial recognition.

Authors:  Lisa M Nimmo; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2005-10

8.  Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.

Authors:  I Neath; J S Nairne
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

9.  Immediate serial recall, word frequency, item identity and item position.

Authors:  M Poirier; J Saint-Aubin
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1996-12

10.  How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory?

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.