Literature DB >> 1641475

The contribution of DNA and chromosome repair deficiencies to the radiosensitivity of ataxia-telangiectasia.

T K Pandita1, W N Hittelman.   

Abstract

Cells derived from individuals with ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) are more sensitive to ionizing radiation and radiomimetic drugs, as evidenced by decreased survival and increased chromosome aberrations at mitosis when compared with normal cell lines. Our previous studies showed that, despite similar initial levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), AT cells express higher initial chromosome damage than do normal cells as demonstrated by the technique of premature chromosome condensation. However, this finding accounted for only a portion of the increased sensitivity (T. K. Pandita and W. N. Hittelman, Radiat. Res. 130, 94-103, 1992). The purpose of the study reported here was to examine the contribution of DNA and chromosome repair to the radiosensitivity of AT cells. Exponentially growing AT and normal lymphoblastoid cells were fractionated into cell cycle phase-enriched populations by centrifugal elutriation, and their DNA and chromosome repair characteristics were evaluated by DNA neutral filter elution (for DNA DSBs) and by premature chromosome condensation, respectively. AT cells exhibited a reduced fast-repair component in both G1- and G2-phase cells, as observed at the level of both DNA DSBs and the chromosome; however, S-phase cells showed nearly normal DNA DSB repair. The findings that AT cells exhibit an increased level of chromosome damage and a deficiency in the fast component (but not the slow component) of repair suggest that chromatin organization might play a major role in the observed sensitivity of AT cells. When survival was plotted as a function of the residual amount of chromosome damage in G1- and G2- phase cells after 90 min of repair, the curves for normal and AT cells approached each other but did not overlap. These results suggest that, although higher initial levels of chromosome damage and reduced chromosome repair capability can explain much of the radiosensitivity of AT cells, other differences in AT cells must also contribute to their sensitivity phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  31 in total

1.  The role of MOF in the ionizing radiation response is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Manika P Bhadra; Nobuo Horikoshi; Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavallipvalli; Arpita Sarkar; Indira Bag; Anita Krishnan; John C Lucchesi; Rakesh Kumar; Qin Yang; Raj K Pandita; Mayank Singh; Utpal Bhadra; Joel C Eissenberg; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Phosphorylation of SMC1 is a critical downstream event in the ATM-NBS1-BRCA1 pathway.

Authors:  Risa Kitagawa; Christopher J Bakkenist; Peter J McKinnon; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Radiological imaging in ataxia telangiectasia: a review.

Authors:  Ishani Sahama; Kate Sinclair; Kerstin Pannek; Martin Lavin; Stephen Rose
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Comparative study on radiosensitivity of various tumor cells and human normal liver cells.

Authors:  Jian-She Yang; Wen-Jian Li; Guang-Ming Zhou; Xiao-Dong Jin; Jing-Guang Xia; Ju-Fang Wang; Zhuan-Zi Wang; Chuan-Ling Guo; Qing-Xiang Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  The cellular control of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Shaun P Scott; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Girdhar G Sharma; Sairei So; Arun Gupta; Rakesh Kumar; Christelle Cayrou; Nikita Avvakumov; Utpal Bhadra; Raj K Pandita; Matthew H Porteus; David J Chen; Jacques Cote; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  MOF phosphorylation by ATM regulates 53BP1-mediated double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Muralidhar L Hegde; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Durga Udayakumar; Nobuo Horikoshi; Mayank Singh; Deepti B Ramnarain; Walter N Hittelman; Sarita Namjoshi; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Tapas K Hazra; Thomas Ludwig; Raj K Pandita; Jessica K Tyler; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Fragments of ATM which have dominant-negative or complementing activity.

Authors:  S E Morgan; C Lovly; T K Pandita; Y Shiloh; M B Kastan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

Authors:  S Misri; S Pandita; R Kumar; T K Pandita
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.