Literature DB >> 16927314

The cellular control of DNA double-strand breaks.

Shaun P Scott1, Tej K Pandita.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most hazardous lesions arising in the genome of eukaryotic organisms, and yet occur normally during DNA replication, meiosis, and immune system development. The efficient repair of DSBs is crucial in maintaining genomic integrity, cellular viability, and the prevention of tumorigenesis. As a consequence, eukaryotic cells have evolved efficient mechanisms that sense and respond to DSBs and ultimately repair the break. The swiftness of the DNA DSB response has paved to the identification of sensors and transducers which allowed to generate a hierarchical signaling paradigm depicting the transduction of the damage signal to numerous downstream effectors (Fig. 1). The function of such effectors involve posttranslational modifications through phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation of the substrates. This review will address the control of DSBs in damaged eukaryotic cells, the physiological processes that require the introduction of a DSB into the genome, and the maintenance of DSBs in non-damaged cells. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16927314      PMCID: PMC3088996          DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  92 in total

1.  H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis.

Authors:  Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; Arkady Celeste; Peter J Romanienko; R Daniel Camerini-Otero; William M Bonner; Katia Manova; Paul Burgoyne; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Chromosome Organization: Reaching out to Embrace New Models.

Authors:  Claire Wyman; Roland Kanaar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases.

Authors:  M Jasin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Cloning, characterization, and localization of mouse and human SPO11.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Class switch recombination signals induce lymphocyte-derived Spo11 expression and Spo11 antisense oligonucleotide inhibits class switching.

Authors:  H Tokuyama; Y Tokuyama
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 4.868

7.  A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes.

Authors:  D Lydall; Y Nikolsky; D K Bishop; T Weinert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma.

Authors:  Y Xu; T Ashley; E E Brainerd; R T Bronson; M S Meyn; D Baltimore
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  XRS2, a DNA repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is needed for meiotic recombination.

Authors:  E L Ivanov; V G Korolev; F Fabre
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  RAD51 and DMC1 form mixed complexes associated with mouse meiotic chromosome cores and synaptonemal complexes.

Authors:  M Tarsounas; T Morita; R E Pearlman; P B Moens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10-18       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  40 in total

1.  The role of MOF in the ionizing radiation response is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Manika P Bhadra; Nobuo Horikoshi; Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavallipvalli; Arpita Sarkar; Indira Bag; Anita Krishnan; John C Lucchesi; Rakesh Kumar; Qin Yang; Raj K Pandita; Mayank Singh; Utpal Bhadra; Joel C Eissenberg; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Girdhar G Sharma; Sairei So; Arun Gupta; Rakesh Kumar; Christelle Cayrou; Nikita Avvakumov; Utpal Bhadra; Raj K Pandita; Matthew H Porteus; David J Chen; Jacques Cote; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Critical role of the POT1 OB domain in maintaining genomic stability.

Authors:  T K Pandita
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Preferential repair of DNA double-strand break at the active gene in vivo.

Authors:  Priyasri Chaurasia; Rwik Sen; Tej K Pandita; Sukesh R Bhaumik
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Detecting ATM-dependent chromatin modification in DNA damage response.

Authors:  Durga Udayakumar; Nobuo Horikoshi; Lopa Mishra; Clayton Hunt; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

6.  spn-A/rad51 mutant exhibits enhanced genomic damage, cell death and low temperature sensitivity in somatic tissues.

Authors:  Chaitali Khan; Sonia Muliyil; Champakali Ayyub; B J Rao
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Role of 53BP1 in the regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Clayton R Hunt; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Raj K Pandita; John Yordy; Deepti B Ramnarain; Nobuo Horikoshi; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 8.  Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

Authors:  S Misri; S Pandita; R Kumar; T K Pandita
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 9.  Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements.

Authors:  Martin Poot; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 10.  Chromatin remodeling finds its place in the DNA double-strand break response.

Authors:  Tej K Pandita; Christine Richardson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.