Literature DB >> 16389383

Laparoscopically assisted colon surgery.

D Vanderpool1, M V Westmoreland.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy has been used in surgical procedures more frequently in the past decade because it reduces postoperative pain, decreases the length of hospitalization, decreases the duration of disability, and provides a better cosmetic result. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with laparoscopic colon surgery at Baylor University Medical Center. Since 1995, we have done 17 procedures, including 10 colon resections and 7 colostomies. The results in these patients have been quite good: only 1 patient was converted to an open procedure, and the remaining 16 patients experienced no mortality, major morbidity, or wound infection.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 16389383      PMCID: PMC1312316          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2000.11927675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  21 in total

Review 1.  Port site recurrences after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic procedures in malignancy.

Authors:  P A Johnstone; D C Rohde; S E Swartz; J E Fetter; S D Wexner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report.

Authors:  A M Cooperman; V Katz; D Zimmon; G Botero
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1991-08

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve.

Authors:  J D Wishner; J W Baker; G C Hoffman; G W Hubbard; R J Gould; S D Wohlgemuth; W K Ruffin; C F Melick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Report of a case.

Authors:  M A Fusco; M W Paluzzi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve.

Authors:  P Reissman; S Cohen; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience.

Authors:  G C Hoffman; J W Baker; C W Fitchett; J H Vansant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is immune function better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection?

Authors:  M Bessler; R L Whelan; A Halverson; M R Treat; R Nowygrod
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Local recurrence following 'curative' surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture.

Authors:  R K Phillips; R Hittinger; L Blesovsky; J S Fry; L P Fielding
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma. A multicenter study.

Authors:  M E Franklin; D Rosenthal; R F Norem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Instrumental Mechanoreceptoric Palpation in Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Rozaliia F Solodova; Vladimir V Galatenko; Eldar R Nakashidze; Sergey G Shapovalyants; Igor L Andreytsev; Mikhail E Sokolov; Vladimir E Podolskii
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2017-12-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.