Literature DB >> 8661831

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: ascending the learning curve.

P Reissman1, S Cohen, E G Weiss, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the results of our first 100 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted colorectal operations. The parameters studied included the type and length of procedure, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion to open surgery, length of ileus, and hospitalization. A total of 100 laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted procedures were performed between May 1991 and April 1994. The mean patient age was 49 years (12-88 years). The procedures included 36 total abdominal colectomies (TACs) (ileoanal reservoir 28, ileorectal anastomosis 6, end-ileostomy 2), 39 segmental resections of the colon and small bowel, 8 resections of the rectum, 7 diverting stoma creations, 7 reversals of Hartmann's procedure, and 3 other procedures. In seven cases (7%) the laparoscopic procedure was converted to a laparotomy. A group of 22 patients sustained 26 complications that included enterostomy (n = 5), hemorrhage (n = 6), intraabdominal abscess (n = 4), prolonged ileus (n = 4), wound infection (n = 2), anastomotic leak (n = 1), aspiration (n = 1), cardiac arrhythmia (n = 1), upper intestinal bleeding (n = 1), and postoperative small bowel obstruction (n = 1). There were no deaths. When divided into three equal, consecutive groups, the patients in the early (n = 33) and intermediate (n = 33) groups had a significantly higher complication rate (42% and 27%, respectively), than those in the late group (n = 34, 12%;p < 0.05). The complication rate in each group was also directly related to the number of TACs performed (18 in the early, 13 in the intermediate, and 5 in the late group). The overall complication rate in TAC cases was significantly higher (42%) when compared to that of all other procedures (segmental resection 9%, nonresectional 12%;p < 0.01). The mean operating time was 4 hours (2.5-6.5 hours) for TAC, 2.5 hours (1.5-5.5 hours) for segmental colonic resection, and 1.6 hours (1.0-2.5 hours) for the nonresectional procedures. The length of ileus was 3.5 days (2-7 days) after TAC, 3 days (2-7 days) after the segmental resections, and 2 days (1-4 days) after the nonresectional procedures. The mean hospital stay was 7.3 days (2-40 days): 8.4 (5-40), 7.0 (4-12), and 6.8 (2-11) days for the TAC, segmental resection, and nonresectional procedures, respectively. We conclude that the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been well established. The morbidity associated with laparoscopic colorectal surgery correlates with a steep learning curve but is also related to the type of procedure. TAC is associated with a higher complication rate than are other laparoscopic colorectal procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661831     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

1.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted ileo-colectomy for tuberculosis.

Authors:  K P Balsara; C R Shah; S Maru; R Sehgal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications.

Authors:  P R Shah; A Joseph; P N Haray
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Masaaki Ito; Masanori Sugito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Yusuke Nishizawa; Yoshiyuki Tsunoda; Norio Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised.

Authors:  Takafumi Maeda; Kok-Yang Tan; Fumio Konishi; Shingo Tsujinaka; Ken Mizokami; Junichi Sasaki; Yutaka J Kawamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hajime Kayano; Junji Okuda; Keitaro Tanaka; Keisaku Kondo; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal surgery in old age: issues of equality and quality.

Authors:  D G Seymour
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables.

Authors:  Alberto Zarak; Alvaro Castillo; Kandace Kichler; Lucy de la Cruz; Leonardo Tamariz; Srinivas Kaza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Why the Resistance: Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Saving the Patient from Tigers.

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Neeraj Dhamija; Shruti Sharma; Sneh Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Surgical teaching does not increase the risk of intraoperative adverse events.

Authors:  Basile Pache; Fabian Grass; Nicolas Fournier; Martin Hübner; Nicolas Demartines; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.