Literature DB >> 6689962

Local recurrence following 'curative' surgery for large bowel cancer: I. The overall picture.

R K Phillips, R Hittinger, L Blesovsky, J S Fry, L P Fielding.   

Abstract

The Large Bowel Cancer Project is a collaborative prospective study of 4228 patients with a histologically proven adenocarcinoma, of whom 2336 (55 per cent) survived a 'curative' resection. Follow-up information is available on 2220 patients (95 per cent). Subsequently, 309 (14 per cent) have developed a local recurrence confirmed by: biopsy (127; 41 per cent), clinical examination (77; 25 per cent), X-ray (15; 5 per cent), a raised CEA (2; 1 per cent), or some other method - e.g. CT scan or a confident unbiopsied laparotomy finding (88; 29 per cent). Statistically significant factors (chi2 test, P less than 0.05) associated with local recurrence are: Dukes' classification: A 4 per cent; B 13 per cent; C 18 per cent Tumour differentiation: Well 11 per cent; Moderate 14 per cent; Poor 21 per cent Obstruction: Absent 13 per cent; Present 21 per cent Perforation: Absent 13 per cent; Present 28 per cent Tumour mobility: Freely mobile 11 per cent; Others 21 per cent Operation performed (rectal and rectosigmoid tumours): Abdomino-perineal 12 per cent; Anterior resection 18 per cent; Surgeon (Consultant only): Range less than 5 per cent to greater than 20 per cent. Stratification of the above variables altered only the statistical significance pertaining to tumour differentiation (P less than 0.1, d.f. = 2). In particular, the differences between Consultant surgeons remained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6689962     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800710104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  90 in total

1.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

2.  The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.

Authors:  K Rigby; S R Brown; G Lakin; M Balsitis; K B Hosie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Rectal and anal endosonography.

Authors:  N Mortensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Colorectal Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon Walsh; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  The clinical pathology of colorectal cancer. A symposium in honour of Basil C. Morson. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  An evaluation of the role of rectal endosonography in rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Beynon
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection forrectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; R Grégoire; P Seshadri; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Peroperative detection of patients with rectal cancer at high risk of local recurrence.

Authors:  S H Silverman; J Moore; H Thompson; M R Keighley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  The investigation of primary rectal cancer by surgeons: current pattern of practice.

Authors:  Todd P W McMullen; Alexandra M Easson; Zane Cohen; Carol J Swallow
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.