Literature DB >> 16382620

In vivo acceleration of ultrasonic tissue heating by microbubble agent.

Shin-Ichiro Umemura1, Ken-Ichi Kawabata, Kazuaki Sasaki.   

Abstract

The ultrasonic power absorbed by a microbubble in its continuous wave response is estimated through numerically solving a version of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation. At an ultrasonic frequency of 3 MHz, a resonant microbubble, approximately 1.1 microm in radius, showed an absorption cross section of about 0.005 mm2 in its low power response. This estimation predicts that the tissue ultrasonic absorption will be doubled when such microbubbles are delivered to the tissue at a concentration of about eight bubbles/mm3 in tissue. An exteriorized murine kidney was exposed to focused ultrasound at 3.2 MHz in degassed saline, and the tissue temperature change was measured. With an intravenous bolus administration of a microbubble agent, the ultrasonically induced temperature elevation was multiplied by up to five times. The enhancement in temperature elevation gradually decreased as the microbubble agent was eliminated from the body. The experimental results agreed with the prediction in the order of magnitude. This effect may have a potential use to enhance the throughput as well as the selectivity of focused ultrasound treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382620     DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1561623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  21 in total

1.  A reduced-order, single-bubble cavitation model with applications to therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Lawrence A Crum; Michael R Bailey; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Modeling of thermal effects in antivascular ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levenback; Chandra M Sehgal; Andrew K W Wood
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.

Authors:  Shin Yoshizawa; Teiichiro Ikeda; Akira Ito; Ryuhei Ota; Shu Takagi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Acoustic emissions during 3.1 MHz ultrasound bulk ablation in vitro.

Authors:  T Douglas Mast; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Chandrapriya Karunakaran; John A Besse; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Acoustic access to the prostate for extracorporeal ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Timothy L Hall; Christopher R Hempel; Brian J Sabb; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Acoustic droplet vaporization for enhancement of thermal ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Mario L Fabiilli; Kevin J Haworth; Frederic Padilla; Scott D Swanson; Oliver D Kripfgans; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Ralph M Bunte; Heather E Price; Margaret S Deitz; Jeff H Tsai; William M-F Lee; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.