Literature DB >> 16378482

Perception of spectral contrast by hearing-impaired listeners.

Laura E Dreisbach1, Marjorie R Leek, Jennifer J Lentz.   

Abstract

The ability to discriminate the spectral shapes of complex sounds is critical to accurate speech perception. Part of the difficulty experienced by listeners with hearing loss in understanding speech sounds in noise may be related to a smearing of the internal representation of the spectral peaks and valleys because of the loss of sensitivity and an accompanying reduction in frequency resolution. This study examined the discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners of highly similar harmonic complexes with a single spectral peak located in 1 of 3 frequency regions. The minimum level difference between peak and background harmonics required to discriminate a small change in the spectral center of the peak was measured for peaks located near 2, 3, or 4 kHz. Component phases were selected according to an algorithm thought to produce either highly modulated (positive Schroeder) or very flat (negative Schroeder) internal waveform envelopes in the cochlea. The mean amplitude difference between a spectral peak and the background components required for discrimination of pairs of harmonic complexes (spectral contrast threshold) was from 4 to 19 dB greater for listeners with hearing impairment than for a control group of listeners with normal hearing. In normal-hearing listeners, improvements in threshold were seen with increasing stimulus level, and there was a strong effect of stimulus phase, as the positive Schroeder stimuli always produced lower thresholds than the negative Schroeder stimuli. The listeners with hearing loss showed no consistent spectral contrast effects due to stimulus phase and also showed little improvement with increasing stimulus level, once their sensitivity loss was overcome. The lack of phase and level effects may be a result of the more linear processing occurring in impaired ears, producing poorer-than-normal frequency resolution, a loss of gain for low amplitudes, and an altered cochlear phase characteristic in regions of damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16378482     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/063)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  6 in total

1.  Spectrotemporal processing differences between auditory cortical fast-spiking and regular-spiking neurons.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.

Authors:  Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun; Paul Reinhart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification.

Authors:  Stephanie Bor; Pamela Souza; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.

Authors:  Michelle R Molis; Anna Diedesch; Frederick Gallun; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

6.  The Effects of Auditory Contrast Tuning upon Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Nathan J Killian; Paul V Watkins; Lisa S Davidson; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.