Literature DB >> 21297168

Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies.

Michelle R Molis1, Marjorie R Leek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the influence of presentation level and mild-to-moderate hearing loss on the identification of a set of vowel tokens systematically varying in the frequency locations of their second and third formants.
METHOD: Five listeners with normal hearing (NH listeners) and five listeners with hearing impairment (HI listeners) identified synthesized vowels that represented both highly identifiable and ambiguous examples of /i/, /[Please see symbol]/, and /[Please see symbol]/.
RESULTS: Response patterns of NH listeners showed significant changes, with an increase in presentation level from 75 dB SPL to 95 dB SPL, including increased category overlap. HI listeners, listening only at the higher level, showed greater category overlap than normal and overall identification patterns that differed significantly from those of NH listeners. Excitation patterns based on estimates of auditory filters suggested smoothing of the internal representations, resulting in impaired formant resolution.
CONCLUSIONS: Both increased presentation level for NH listeners and the presence of hearing loss produced a significant change in vowel identification for this stimulus set. Major differences were observed between NH listeners and HI listeners in vowel category overlap and in the sharpness of boundaries between vowel tokens. It is likely that these findings reflect imprecise internal spectral representations due to reduced frequency selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21297168      PMCID: PMC3149778          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0218)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  28 in total

1.  The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; Z Czyzewski; L A Krishnan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses.

Authors:  B Rakerd; P F Seitz; M Whearty
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification.

Authors:  S Gatehouse; J Gordon
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-02

6.  The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency.

Authors:  J I Alcántara; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effect of temporal waveform shape on spectral discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  A maximum-likelihood method for estimating thresholds in a yes-no task.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.

Authors:  S Rosen; R J Baker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Acoustic correlates of vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sarah Hargus Ferguson; Hugo Quené
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun; Paul Reinhart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Vowel perception in listeners with normal hearing and in listeners with hearing loss: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Mark Hedrick; Lauren Charles; Nicole Drakopoulos Street
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.