Literature DB >> 23007720

Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.

Michelle R Molis1, Anna Diedesch, Frederick Gallun, Marjorie R Leek.   

Abstract

Vowel identification is largely dependent on listeners' access to the frequency of two or three peaks in the amplitude spectrum. Earlier work has demonstrated that, whereas normal-hearing listeners can identify harmonic complexes with vowel-like spectral shapes even with very little amplitude contrast between "formant" components and remaining harmonic components, listeners with hearing loss require greater amplitude differences. This is likely the result of the poor frequency resolution that often accompanies hearing loss. Here, we describe an additional acoustic dimension for emphasizing formant versus non-formant harmonics that may supplement amplitude contrast information. The purpose of this study was to determine whether listeners were able to identify "vowel-like" sounds using temporal (component phase) contrast, which may be less affected by cochlear loss than spectral cues, and whether overall identification improves when congruent temporal and spectral information are provided together. Five normal-hearing and five hearing-impaired listeners identified three vowels over many presentations. Harmonics representing formant peaks were varied in amplitude, phase, or a combination of both. In addition to requiring less amplitude contrast, normal-hearing listeners could accurately identify the sounds with less phase contrast than required by people with hearing loss. However, both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired groups demonstrated the ability to identify vowel-like sounds based solely on component phase shifts, with no amplitude contrast information, and they also showed improved performance when congruent phase and amplitude cues were combined. For nearly all listeners, the combination of spectral and temporal information improved identification in comparison to either dimension alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23007720      PMCID: PMC3540275          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-012-0352-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  13 in total

1.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.

Authors:  Jeffrey J DiGiovanni; Peggy B Nelson; Robert S Schlauch
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones.

Authors:  Hedwig Gockel; Brian C J Moore; Roy D Patterson; Ray Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform.

Authors:  R D Patterson; M H Allerhand; C Giguère
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise.

Authors:  M R Leek; V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A M Simpson; B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

7.  Contrast enhancement improves the representation of /epsilon/-like vowels in the hearing-impaired auditory nerve.

Authors:  R L Miller; B M Calhoun; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The identification of vowel-like harmonic complexes: effects of component phase, level, and fundamental frequency.

Authors:  J I Alcántara; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; M F Dorman; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Gregory Ellis; Kendra Marks; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Automated Classification of Vowel Category and Speaker Type in the High-Frequency Spectrum.

Authors:  Jeremy J Donai; Saeid Motiian; Gianfranco Doretto
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2016-04-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.