Literature DB >> 16378009

Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.

Evelin Schneider1, Franz Grehn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT, Pascal tonometer, Swiss Microtechnology AG, Port, Switzerland) was recently introduced as a new method of intraocular pressure measurement, supposedly independent of corneal properties. In this study we analyzed the agreement and correlation of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and investigated the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature. We also considered preferential patient groups for both methods.
METHODS: In a prospective study of 100 eyes without glaucoma, intraocular pressure was measured using dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, followed by measurements of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature.
RESULTS: A clear correlation between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry was found (r = 0.693; P < 0.001). Dynamic contour tonometry generally resulted in higher intraocular pressure measurements (median difference + 1.8 mm Hg, mean difference + 2.34 mm Hg). Unlike dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry was remarkably affected by central corneal thickness, but neither method was significantly influenced by corneal curvature. Bland-Altman graphs showed remarkable disagreement between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, which could be partially explained by the influence of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry. To obtain valid readings, dynamic contour tonometry required a more extensive selection of patients than Goldmann applanation tonometry.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contour tonometry seems to be a reliable method for intraocular pressure measurement, which unlike Goldmann applanation tonometry is not influenced by central corneal thickness. In clinical practice, advantages from dynamic contour tonometry can be expected for cooperative patients, outpatients, and patients with sufficient bilateral ocular fixation, whereas Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements are more reliable in case of patients with inadequate cooperation, poor vision, or nystagmus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16378009     DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000196655.85460.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  31 in total

Review 1.  [Dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  C Kniestedt; H E Kanngiesser
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Influence of residual corneal bed thickness after myopic LASIK on intraocular pressure measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  L Muller; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Tetsuya Morita; Nobuyuki Shoji; Kazutaka Kamiya; Mana Hagishima; Fusako Fujimura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiro Mawatari; Akira Kobayashi; Hideaki Yokogawa; Kazuhisa Sugiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Dynamic contour tonometry over silicone hydrogel contact lens.

Authors:  Andrew K C Lam; Jimmy S H Tse
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-08-28

6.  [Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  J Wachtl; M Töteberg-Harms; S Frimmel; C Kniestedt
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  [Evaluation of dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus].

Authors:  N Schädle; J D Unterlauft; T Klink; G Geerling
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Robert N Weinreb; Gerald Hobbs
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Jooeun Lee; Chang Hwan Lee; Jaewan Choi; Sam Young Yoon; Kyung Rim Sung; Seong Bae Park; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.