Literature DB >> 16377817

Academic research record-keeping: best practices for individuals, group leaders, and institutions.

Alan A Schreier1, Kenneth Wilson, David Resnik.   

Abstract

During the last half of the 20th century, social and technological changes in academic research groups have challenged traditional research record-keeping practices, making them either insufficient or obsolete. New practices have developed but standards (best practices) are still evolving. Based on the authors' review and analysis of a number of sources, they present a set of systematically compiled best practices for research record-keeping for academic research groups. These best practices were developed as an adjunct to a research project on research ethics aimed at examining the actual research record-keeping practices of active academic scientists and their impact on research misconduct inquiries. The best practices differentiate and provide separate standards for three different levels within the university: the individual researcher, the research group leader, and the department/institution. They were developed using a combination of literature reviews, surveys of university integrity officials, focus groups of active researchers, and inspection of university policies on research record-keeping. The authors believe these best practices constitute a ''snapshot'' of the current normative standards for research records within the academic research community. They are offered as ethical and practical guidelines subject to continuing evolution and not as absolute rules. They may be especially useful in training the next generation of researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16377817      PMCID: PMC3943904          DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  1 in total

1.  Scientists behaving badly.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; Melissa S Anderson; Raymond de Vries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Proper laboratory notebook practices: protecting your intellectual property.

Authors:  Jason T Nickla; Matthew B Boehm
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Research records and the resolution of misconduct allegations at research universities.

Authors:  Kenneth Wilson; Alan Schreier; Angel Griffin; David Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria.

Authors:  Omokhoa A Adeleye; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Reproducibility and Research Integrity.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  A quick guide for using Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook.

Authors:  Santiago Guerrero; Andrés López-Cortés; Jennyfer M García-Cárdenas; Pablo Saa; Alberto Indacochea; Isaac Armendáriz-Castillo; Ana Karina Zambrano; Verónica Yumiceba; Andy Pérez-Villa; Patricia Guevara-Ramírez; Oswaldo Moscoso-Zea; Joel Paredes; Paola E Leone; César Paz-Y-Miño
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The lab management practices of "Research Exemplars" that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Ashley Kuykendall; James M DuBois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Progressive research collaborations and the limits of soft power.

Authors:  Olga Kits; Camille Angus; Anna MacLeod; Jonathan Tummons
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-02

8.  Long-term preservation of biomedical research data.

Authors:  Vivek Navale; Matthew McAuliffe
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.